Jump to content
 

Collett 'Bow Ended' Standard 57' Corridor Stock Coaches for 2016


Graham_Muz
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

I may well do someday but summer's the wrong time. To anyone contemplating fitting etched sides, i suggest they detail, paint and glaze the sides before gluing them with Evostick to the roof and ends.  This saves mucking about painting and masking the roof and ends. It is how I did BR Mk.I corridor coaches and some of the Gresleys.

If only I'd thought of that - my 11 Bulleids took me ages!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree but I also think a full brake and a van composite would do well

 

As Derek and Larry appeared to be producing them in numbers then I may not be such a good seller.

 

Add to that, the number of Exleys, and kit built ones. I have built four myself (post 28 livery) three of which were for other people, and have the complete BSL parts for another three.

 

The GWR only ever built six, so they would not have been as common as some would have you believe.

 

However the van compo is one I was surprised Hornby did not go for. There were lots of them and they literally went everywhere.

Again, I have made several over the years, but mainly for on GWR modellers. It was not unusual to see one behind a streamline Coronation out of Liverpool as the Treacy books proves. Equally leaving Aberdeen and Edinburgh behind LNER engines was common.

 

Mike Wiltshire

Link to post
Share on other sites

With my coach producer hat on, I came up against, "I don't need any more compo's or brake coaches". That one sentence put the kibosh on brake compo's and so I have held over CADs for the time being. But I agree a RTR brake compo makes for an attractive vehicle and useful for short trains where a minimum of first class accommodation is required. The "usual" two brake thirds and a composite train formation ends up with too much first class.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I may well do someday but summer's the wrong time. To anyone contemplating fitting etched sides, i suggest they detail, paint and glaze the sides before gluing them with Evostick to the roof and ends. This saves mucking about painting and masking the roof and ends. It is how I did BR Mk.I corridor coaches and some of the Gresleys.

Thanks for the tip Larry. I am doing a mixed vintage LMS excursion train and I was wondering if that would be the best way to paint. I have cut out the RTR body sides and painted the roof and ends of the first coach. I am now going to pre-finish the sides as you suggest. Should save me a lot of time and fiddly painting round other colours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

As Derek and Larry appeared to be producing them in numbers then I may not be such a good seller.

 

Add to that, the number of Exleys, and kit built ones. I have built four myself (post 28 livery) three of which were for other people, and have the complete BSL parts for another three.

 

The GWR only ever built six, so they would not have been as common as some would have you believe.

 

However the van compo is one I was surprised Hornby did not go for. There were lots of them and they literally went everywhere.

Again, I have made several over the years, but mainly for on GWR modellers. It was not unusual to see one behind a streamline Coronation out of Liverpool as the Treacy books proves. Equally leaving Aberdeen and Edinburgh behind LNER engines was common.

 

Mike Wiltshire

 

In terms of 57' coaches in the mid-'30s, I have concentrated research on the North-West and cross-country expresses, as well as their limited use in WoE services.  Looking at the formations of such trains on the South Devon mainline, I find that Brake Composites were very common.  Against expectations, perhaps, they were the most common type! 

 

To run a full timetable you can use far fewer coaches than the real railway.  This is because your Up and Down balancing services can use the same coaches, rather than two sets as would typically have been the case on the prototype.  I calculated how many GW 57' passenger coaches I would need to run a full 24-hour timetable (this, of course, would utilise a combination of wooden panelled toplights, steel bodied toplights, Collett bow-enders and later Collett flat-enders):

 

Van Thirds                      5

Van Thirds (3 compt.)     2

Third                               2

Composite                      5

Brake Composite            8

 

Yes, 8.  And only 2 All Thirds.  This is the weekday winter timetable (running into July!) and Saturday formations, particularly in summer, would doubtless see more Thirds added as strengtheners.  Even so, I suspect few would have expected a 4:1 ratio in favour of Brake Composites.

 

Part of the explanation is that Brake Composites are not used to make up short trains, but are used as portions of a longer train, or part of a portion of a train. 

 

Another point is that none of the formations concerned utilise more than one GW 57' composite, so the nice idea of marshalling RH and LH compos in a train has no application in these services.

 

Finally, Brake Vans, or 'full brakes' were also very common, but these services are more likely to have employed the 60' K40, than the 57' K38 (Ocean Mails), though I have spotted the latter on cross-country services.  There were, of course, a number of 57' toplight diagrams and plenty of NC brake vans (of Dean vintage) were used.

 

Of course, this is just one mainline, and the situation may have been completely different on, say Paddington to Birkenhead or South Wales services. 

 

EDIT: Before anyone gets too excited about 'only needing 22 coaches' on cross-country services, my list omits passenger brake vans, parcels vans, siphons, restaurant cars, the Bristol TPO and the significant number of LMS vehicles employed through to Devon on these services.  Then, of course, there is the other 50% of express services, the WOE, which generally used 70 footers, or special stock for The Limited, plus siphons, mail, newspapers vans, sleepers, TPOs, restaurant cars etc, plus sets used for stopping services (though express coaches on balancing workings were also used on stoppers).   I reckon that about 125 items of coaching stock would enable you to have a fair crack at the weekday winter timetabled services.

 

Then, of course, there are specials ....

 

But, again, who would have thought that, out of a stock of approximately 125 vehicles, only 2 would need to be 57' GW Thirds!

Edited by Edwardian
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

K38 variety. Having gone through the drawers here are four Ocean Mails vans from four different sources.

Top one is the BSL I usually run. Next is an MTK (which I forgot I had) , then a Westdale and finally an Exley (flat ended on an LMS underframe). I have other sides from Hammond,Comet and now David Geen is planning one.

Has the K38 been produced by more manufacturers than any other diagram. Not convinced sales will be significant if Hornby went down the K38 route.

 

post-9992-0-08219800-1468177806_thumb.jpg

 

Mike Wiltshire

 

 

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Has the K38 been produced by more manufacturers than any other diagram. Not convinced sales will be significant if Hornby went down the K38 route.

But only in kit form. The fact that it keeps cropping up a selling well suggests that it might be a good punt for RTR.
Link to post
Share on other sites

There were only six of them.  It is possible that only five were lettered for Ocean Mails.  At least one was used for newspaper traffic after 1942.  They were quite long lived - two went in 1958, one in 1961 and the other three subsequently.

 

If the Hornby range were to be extended this would no be my first choice.  I would rather see the E128 brake composite and/or the suburbans that have been mentioned before.  However, there is no doubty in my mind that some people will buy anything.

 

Chris

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A modeller is not going to buy more than one K38 no matter how pretty it looks, a K40 though....

I won't! I've built two from Comet and other parts, one in post-war Ocean Mails livery (which I'm told is correct) and the other in plain Crimson.

 

I'd be keen on more GWR coaches, but not non-corridor stock. Although almost any corridor coach diagram seems to have been recorded on almost every train photographed, non-corridor stock was built in much smaller numbers and for very specific places.

 

Toplight suburban for Birmingham; Mainline and City/articulated stock for London. Various 57', 60', 64' and 70' types, and unlike the corridor stuff, this did tend to run in sets.

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

K38 variety. Having gone through the drawers here are four Ocean Mails vans from four different sources.

Top one is the BSL I usually run. Next is an MTK (which I forgot I had) , then a Westdale and finally an Exley (flat ended on an LMS underframe). I have other sides from Hammond,Comet and now David Geen is planning one.

Has the K38 been produced by more manufacturers than any other diagram. Not convinced sales will be significant if Hornby went down the K38 route.

 

attachicon.gifk38 variety.jpg

 

Mike Wiltshire

 

Are a lot of Exley GWR coaches not accurate when compared to the prototype?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are a lot of Exley GWR coaches not accurate when compared to the prototype?

They are certainly short. the underframe/bogies have always been based on the LMS coaches that I have seen. I do not think they were ever suppose to be 'scale models, but were a major improvement on what was available. The most accurate I have is the diner which is a reasonable representation of a H25.

 

I have only seen Hawksworth post 45 livery examples. I have four, that my dad bought when I was very young. My favourite is the sleeping car as no one else appeared to have one, when I was growing up. 

 

They may not be accurate but as a complete train, they looked impressive, especially when everyone else appeared to running Rovex/Hornby/Trix 'shorty' coaches.

 

Mike Wiltshire

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They may not be accurate but as a complete train, they looked impressive, especially when everyone else appeared to running Rovex/Hornby/Trix 'shorty' coaches.

 

Mike Wiltshire

Spot-on Mike. At the age of 14 or so I saved up for an Exler 'Popular' LMS corridor third. I took it to the local model shop and everyone drooled. Exley coaches were thee coaches in their day. The glossy crimson lake was a finish to aim for when started using spray equipment.....Exleys were stoved which is why it is often difficult to strip.

Edited by coachmann
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't! I've built two from Comet and other parts, one in post-war Ocean Mails livery (which I'm told is correct) and the other in plain Crimson.

 

I'd be keen on more GWR coaches, but not non-corridor stock. Although almost any corridor coach diagram seems to have been recorded on almost every train photographed, non-corridor stock was built in much smaller numbers and for very specific places.

 

Toplight suburban for Birmingham; Mainline and City/articulated stock for London. Various 57', 60', 64' and 70' types, and unlike the corridor stuff, this did tend to run in sets.

 

Paul

 

 

According to the figures in Russel / Harris there were actually quite a lot of the non-corridor suburban equivalents to the Hornby Bow Enders. Also some 54 foot versions too.

 

D98 6 compartment brake/Thirds 50 (? Russel)  E131 Composites 56 Some of these were Some Chester and Birminghm areas but not all.

D101 5 compartment brake/thirds 24, E134 Composites 12 C56 Thirds 12 (the latter two with D101s for Cardiff division sets ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

To amplify Darwinian's post above:

 

D98/E131/E131/D98 - initial allocations 18 sets Birmingham, 5 sets Chaster, 5 sets London

 

D101/C56/E134/C56/D101 - initial allocations 10 sets Cardiff, 2 sets not traced.  I'm sure John Lewis knows.

 

Some reallocation and disbanding took place in World War 2 and soon after the formation of BR the Birmingham sets were reformed as 3 coach sets.  London sets tended to be cascaded into the country as newer stock arrived.  Most of the Hawksworth non-corridors started their working life in London.  In London in the 1940s and Cardiff in 1953 four coach sets were replaced by five coach formations.

 

Which 54 ft coaches did you have in mind, Darwinian?

 

Chris

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

To amplify Darwinian's post above:

 

D98/E131/E131/D98 - initial allocations 18 sets Birmingham, 5 sets Chaster, 5 sets London

 

D101/C56/E134/C56/D101 - initial allocations 10 sets Cardiff, 2 sets not traced.  I'm sure John Lewis knows.

 

Which 54 ft coaches did you have in mind, Darwinian?

 

Chris

 

Sorry, late night typo. Should have been 58'4".

Anyway I've loojked again and -

I think it was due to the bracketting in the table in Lewis being misleading as it included lot 1375 which were D95 Corridor Brake thirds. Lots 1376 - 77 are cited as 20 four coach trains but no area of allocation is given.

 

Adrian.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...

Very happy to say that following me getting four of the five GWR Collett Bow Ended Carriages in March, my supplier AGR Model Railway Store in Leighton Buzzard was able to get his hands on one of the rare R4679 models for me over the weekend...!! :) Looking forward to getting this coach tomorrow and completing my rake of GWR Collett Bow Ended Coaches.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...