Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

For those interested in old cars.


DDolfelin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Nope it was the standard Rootes ohv engine which began as a 1390cc, replacing the old sidevalve engine  in the new Audax range, and ended up as a 1725cc in the Arrow range of cars, the ultimate version being the Holbay H120 versions.

 

 

The Avenger range of engines was completely new at launch and had nothing in common with other Rootes power units. In fact the Avenger was one of those unusual vehicles that were entirely new when introduced, new body, engine, gearbox and rear axle!

Same rust though!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Where is Horsetan?

 I miss his updates on his Citroen!

Cheers from Oz,

Peter C.

 

There's was a rumour that he was last reported buried under a landslide of Portescap motors.  Rescue teams have been digging for three days.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I discovered an Alfa Romeo today which I've never seen before, the Bertone designed 2600 De Luxe of 1965, presumably built on the same (or similar) platform as the two door 2600 Sprint which was launched in 1962...

 

post-7638-0-01650700-1540843377.jpg

 

post-7638-0-28132000-1540843393.jpg

 

post-7638-0-54374100-1540843410.jpg

 

For an Alfa it's quite plain looking, but modern enough for the time I suppose.

Edited by Rugd1022
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice Bugatti? Simca [Aronde?], Borgward [isabella?]..plus,what I briefly thought to be , a Mk2 Austin Healey Sprite?  No mention of the clanking Torpoint ferry, disappointingly? 

 

Is anybody going to note reg numbers, to see if any of the cars & stuff shown, are still actually around? {a [pastime of mine, when nothing better grabs my attention]

Edited by alastairq
Link to post
Share on other sites

If we haven't seen this before we should have.

 

Nice interior shots of the ASCC Newton Chambers transporters in operation.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37eizC7zW7s

 

Those transporter aircraft also appeared at the end of the 1961 film "A Weekend with Lulu" starring Bob Monkhouse, Leslie Phillips and Irene Handl, which was shown on Talking Pictures TV earlier this evening.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Astons are covered in bits robbed from other manufacturers parts bins, common to the Cortina Mk 2 as well!

Common practice. Let’s not forget that the Lola Mk 6 GT, inspiration for the Ford GT40, used Ford Cortina rear lights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also seen on some Bedford Ice Cream vans.

 

Yep the famous "Ban the Bomb" rear lamps.

 

 

The later TVR's, Vixen Tuscans etc used the Mk2 Cortina rear lamps and later raided the SD1 parts bin for the wedge rear light clusters!

 

 

The 80's/90's cars went on to use Sierra and Mk 4 escort r lamps too.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

post-33698-0-52354400-1541178658_thumb.jpgNot really an "old car"  as such, but a replica Jaguar XKSS having a rewire!

 

 

 

Wired up the dash yesterday, trying to make in look suitably vintage!

 

 

 

 

Engine bay loom all done, just needs binding up.

 

 

post-33698-0-74245100-1541178155_thumb.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

post-33698-0-88782800-1541178419_thumb.jpg

Edited by Southern Steve
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Off the current thread trend I know, but...........the other night I watched an interesting C4 doc about the food we eat & drink.  The topic was tea. Whether we [preferred to drink tea out of a mug [china?] or a paper cup?

 

An interesting experiment was conducted by a UNi professor, to show how psychology actually comes into play, rather than simply, taste?

 

A number of students were asked to taste the tea on two tables, all in typical paper cups.....and vote for the tea they liked best.

 

Surprisingly, all voted for the tea on one table...I think, without exception?
 

They were then told, the tea in the cups on both tables was exactly the same....[which surprised many, including the presenter.]  Absolutely identical!

 

The only difference was, all the cups on one table had a small circular weight glued on underneath, out of sight.

 

It was the weighted cup table that attracted all the votes [despite the tea being the same]

 

The point of the demonstration was, to show how we are influenced psychologically, into thinking, automatically, that 'heavier' equates to 'better quality'.

 

This was demonstrated to me the other day, when I asked some mates which was the better quality electrical item [a starter solenoid].....the cheap [few quid] pattern item, or a genuine Motorcraft item [as it happens, but priced about 6 times as much]....the Motorcraft item was chosen by all to be 'better', even though there was , externally, no difference in shape....but, the pattern item was a deal lighter!

 

 

All of which led me to consider, why the huge popularity amongst new car buyers, for the slab sided, bullnosed monstrosities [AUDI/VW Panzerwagens, for example?].that are inhabiting our roads?

 

I reckon it's all because they 'appear' heavier to look at..therefore ''must' be heavier? Therefore, must be safer, and of 'better quality'?

 

[All of which is an illusion]...........but I cannot think why they would be so popular, compared to cars with lower waistlines, less obvious panelwork, etc?  especially when the interior space doesn't equate to the outside size? [Tardis, in reverse? Smaller on the inside, than on the outside??]

 

It's all psychological? 

 

Isn't it??

Edited by alastairq
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is a lot of psychology to it.

 

Some things are obvious. A solid think of a closing door rather than a tinny clank.

 

But reputation is a massive amount. The German cars I have had or worked on I have been quite unimpressed with. Quality hasn’t been impressive. Yet people will rave about the quality of their Audi / BMW / Mini.

 

Connected to your weight theory, people tended to assume heavy 4x4 vehicles were safer. Yet traditionally they tended to fair worse in crash tests as a solid separate chassis tended to have little shock absorption. Added to which poorer handling, braking, etc meant they were more likely to be involved in an accident. Both points probably less important these days with the proliferation of soft readers.

 

All the best

 

Katy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...