Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

For those interested in old cars.


DDolfelin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not all old vehicles are abandoned, had my 1977 Forward Control Land Rover in for a once over and MOT last week and brought it back on Friday morning. New MOT, no advisories, :)

 

Her we are, arriving back,

 

post-6861-0-99344500-1467810453_thumb.jpeg

 

 

Next jobs, fit inertia reel belts and more comfortable seats (not difficult), upgrade existing 1 candlepower headlights to Halogens and refurbish dials and dashboard.

 

 

Edit; Yeah, I like Land Rovers.

 

.

Edited by Arthur
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yes and no. It is basically a Land Rover Defender which followed a direct line of development from the earliest models. To intimate it is little more than the same vehicle as 1948 would be wide of the mark.

 

The ones in Iraq carried light armour really intended to defend against bricks and bottles, possibly small arms fire etc. i.e. the kind of conditions found in Northern Ireland and possibly expected in other areas of civilian unrest.

 

They were never intended to be proof against military grade weapons and explosives as were encountered routinely in Iraq.

 

These are essentially soft skin vehicles and should never have been deployed in those conditions. Vehicles subsequently developed to withstand IE device attacks have armoured V shaped hulls to deflect the blast outwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vehicle supposedly replacing the Land Rover for these sorts of engagements, unless things have changed, is this, the Ocelot

 

post-6861-0-84021100-1467812980_thumb.jpeg

 

I think it's pretty clear that if you need that for your troops to travel safely in then sending them out in lightly armoured Snatch Land Rovers was, well, .....you decide.

 

Of course, at the time of operations in Iraq, the British Army had nothing else in sufficient numbers.

 

 

.

Edited by Arthur
Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed - witness this which I was looking at in the IWM North at the weekend. This one is South African if memory serves.

 

Imperial-War-Museum-North-40549.jpg

 

I can highly recommend this museum if you (like me) haven't been before.

 

Aha, a Trabant P601S Estate!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed - witness this which I was looking at in the IWM North at the weekend. This one is South African if memory serves.

 

Imperial-War-Museum-North-40549.jpg

 

I can highly recommend this museum if you (like me) haven't been before.

 

There's a whole lotta VW in there if I'm any judge. I'd have thought that, in the event of copping a blast, the occupants might survive but they'll be pretty much immobilised. I don't see the mechanicals and running gear staying attached too well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a whole lotta VW in there if I'm any judge. I'd have thought that, in the event of copping a blast, the occupants might survive but they'll be pretty much immobilised. I don't see the mechanicals and running gear staying attached too well.

Yes. It's Herbie Goes To War.

There is/was one at Duxford.

 

I rather think going round a corner above walking pace would finish it off...

Edited by Guest
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The running gear is sacrificial, it's not meant to survive. Essentially it's an armoured bath on wheels, a cheap (relatively), speedy and safe method of transport. The roll cage anticipates the vehicle might be blown up and over. Try to bomb proof the running gear and weight, cost and complexity rise rapidly, for example an Ocelot costs nearly £1 million per vehicle.

 

The occupants are intended to survive, there's no expectation that they'll be driving home in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After hearing that 27 British soldiers were killed in Iraq by roadside IEDs, I was curious to see how the Americans responded to roadside IEDs in Iraq. I found:  "Humvees proved very vulnerable to IEDs; in the first four months of 2006, 67 U.S. troops died in Humvees”   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humvee

 

So the US military developed the MRAP (Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected) vehicle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRAP

 

But I was interested to read that this in turn evolved out of the original South African https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casspir police personnel carrier with its characteristic V shaped hull. This (I think with Benz mechanicals) seems to have become one of the most common military vehicles through Africa (except maybe for Japanese pick-up 'bakkis') and I read has been adopted in India.

 

Both the MRAP and the £1M Ocelot do look a lot more expensive than the stock SA police Casspir.

 

dh

 

[i wish I could share the widespread love for the classic Defender; my sister (in a coma for 3 months) and I were lucky to survive being stuffed violently under the back of a flat truck in a 1950s canvas tilt 88".  Had we been wearing seat belts we'd have been decapitated]

Edited by runs as required
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. It's Herbie Goes To War.

There is/was one at Duxford.

 

I rather think going round a corner above walking pace would finish it off...

 

That's what the circular roll cage is for :D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

May I offer my 3 cars for your interest?

 

1979 Morris Marina 1.3HL

 

IMG_20140401_220508.jpg

 

1976 Mini Scamp 1100

 

IMG_20140401_220526.jpg

 

1982 Austin Ambassador 2.0HL

 

IMG_20140401_220307.jpg

 

 

Watch out for low flying pianos

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the above any kind of Mini Moke derivative ?

I can't believe how my young wife used to put up with us driving around Malta in a Moke in the mid 1960s with a (car mad) 3 year old and a new born baby!

But I really hankered after a one piece plastic 2CV Mehari.

 

dh

 

Ed

sorry, I've only just read your screen sticker, presumably it's a kit.

Edited by runs as required
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a kit. Using the mechanical bits from a 1100 Mini Clubman. Wasn't built by me, I bought it 4th hand. Part galvanised frame and aluminium panels. Legal to drive with the doors, roof and rear canvas off!

 

The Scamps have a higher ground clearance (by about an inch!) than the Mokes.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got an aversion to Mokes. I used to share lifts with a work colleague to college when we did day release. One day he thought it would be fun to drive straight over a crossroads without stopping or looking, in his very unprotected Moke! I did all the driving after that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I hired a Moke when holidaying in Barbados. When there was the occasional heavy downpour it mattered little whether the top was up or down. I kept the hood up to avoid sunburn rather than to keep dry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re #2910, love the 900cc BMW. I had a 600cc R60/6 which was a very fine machine, until I was sideswiped by an uninsured Lada .. the curse of East European driving standards is nothing new in East Anglia!

 

Re #2925 I suspect that the Model T Ford had a lot to do with non-standard foot controls in American cars; the cone-and-band transmission had a completely different foot pedal configuration, and they were made in huge numbers. The centre-mounted throttle, with clutch on the bell housing and foot brake on the other side seems to have been common until the 1930s when all-wheel hydraulic brakes became usual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vehicle supposedly replacing the Land Rover for these sorts of engagements, unless things have changed, is this, the Ocelot

 

attachicon.gifimage.jpeg

 

I think it's pretty clear that if you need that for your troops to travel safely in then sending them out in lightly armoured Snatch Land Rovers was, well, .....you decide.

 

Of course, at the time of operations in Iraq, the British Army had nothing else in sufficient numbers.

 

 

.

 Foxhound...

  

 

Costly it may be...but it's capabilities extend far beyond simply carting people around with impunity.

 

One problem US vehicles may well have, is a lack of maneuverability.

 

Something the above doesn't suffer from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have been taking a shuffty at what older vehicles I might decide to get hold of, once I finally 'retire' from my present employment  [12 more Fridays left, after tomorrow]

 

I already have the item in my avatar..and a 126 to weld, & rebuild....

 

My daily driver is currently old enough to vote by a good margin....

 

But I don't think I want any ground-up restorations....a good, rolling fettle jobbie that I can 'use' daily is preferred........so, spares availability must be good, and not too difficult for a quite tall/large OAP to get in & out of.

 

Curently, my shortlist consits of

 

SAAB 96 [V4].....or..

 

.MGB GT, preferably pre-72-ish, be nice with wire wheels.....or

 

maybe a Trumpet GT6..[preferably not the kamm-tailed jobbie, but not the early one's either...maybe around G-plate ['68 or '69]...but not sure how much room is inside, for me, as I'm getting a bit stiff & crotchety...or

 

Maybe a Ford Y type [ since I am familiar with the mechanicals...and SFS hold large spares stocks....]....

 

I tried getting into & out of a chum's Sprite the other week...I used to own one, decades ago.... a bit of an undignified struggle , in & out....[should see me trying to get in the Dellow!!  :)      ]

 

SO....any recommendations, or observations[ be as rude as you like, it'll all help]

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have been taking a shuffty at what older vehicles I might decide to get hold of, once I finally 'retire' from my present employment  [12 more Fridays left, after tomorrow]

 

I already have the item in my avatar..and a 126 to weld, & rebuild....

 

My daily driver is currently old enough to vote by a good margin....

 

But I don't think I want any ground-up restorations....a good, rolling fettle jobbie that I can 'use' daily is preferred........so, spares availability must be good, and not too difficult for a quite tall/large OAP to get in & out of.

 

Curently, my shortlist consits of

 

SAAB 96 [V4].....or..

 

.MGB GT, preferably pre-72-ish, be nice with wire wheels.....or

 

maybe a Trumpet GT6..[preferably not the kamm-tailed jobbie, but not the early one's either...maybe around G-plate ['68 or '69]...but not sure how much room is inside, for me, as I'm getting a bit stiff & crotchety...or

 

Maybe a Ford Y type [ since I am familiar with the mechanicals...and SFS hold large spares stocks....]....

 

I tried getting into & out of a chum's Sprite the other week...I used to own one, decades ago.... a bit of an undignified struggle , in & out....[should see me trying to get in the Dellow!!  :)      ]

 

SO....any recommendations, or observations[ be as rude as you like, it'll all help]

 

 

Gosh! A  Ford Y type?

My (pretend) uncle Reg had one he used to let me drive when he came to see us. 

A splendidly Spartan vehicle.

But I once tried driving it back home along the Ashbourne-Buxton road in a (June!) snowstorm and the vaccuum wipers kept being overcome on the rising gradients.

You'd have to stop at the top, wipe the screen clear and set off down the other side in hope but the wiped area would quickly contract to a narrow slit then stop completely on the next rise.

A whole lot of fun for a spotty 17 year old trying to navigate by looking out of the open side window.

 

I regret not having ever owned a Citroen Traction - and was given rides to school just after the war in a neighbour's black Lancia Aprilia. You still occasionally see them as everyday cars in Italy.

:senile:

  dh

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...