Jump to content
 

Please use M,M&M only for topics that do not fit within other forum areas. All topics posted here await admin team approval to ensure they don't belong elsewhere.

Wright writes.....


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, 88C said:

Re Redcraft kits, I am sorry to say that they are no longer trading. I met John Harris, the brother of Derek who were the proprietors and he said that the market had dried up. The kits were from hand drawn etching masters way back in the late 80s. I have built all of the Barry Railway kits they produced and Derek was very good at supplying chassis kits for scratch building projects. 
 

Brian

Good morning Brian,

 

Do you have any pictures of the Recraft kits you've made, please? 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Morning Tony,

 

I do have photos and will post some when I get chance. There are several scattered on my Llanforen thread and you posted one on here after I visited with Gordon a few years ago, I have since fixed the wonky chimney.

 

Brian

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Well done for finding the photos. My scratch built models will be on display at the MAG meeting in Derby and the whole lot along with Llanforen Shed will be at the club show in October.

 

It was pure chance that I met John Harris at the Gloucestershire, Warwickshire gala, we just happened to be in the same compartment and got chatting. I was able to show him some photos which I had on the camera. It’s a small world.

 

Brian

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
27 minutes ago, Tony Wright said:

Thanks for showing these Brian,

 

I'd quite forgotten your visit (from over four years ago - prior to Covid!).

 

BarryRly0-6-2T.jpg.6ab3e654d62a557aaf3d76028e9f3eb2.jpg

 

BarryRly2-4-2TandPayVan.jpg.1deaabef8cdd006b2f587de294f5caf8.jpg

 

BarryRlyAmerican0-6-2T.jpg.1d229e3834bbe2ed3912f712a7130439.jpg

 

Your lovely models certainly make interesting subjects.

 

Small companies, making 'obscure' loco kits used to be quite common. However as a lessening demand, age, mortality, a decline in modelling skills and increasing costs take effect, then the disappearance of such ranges is inevitable. 

 

Thank goodness such 'obscurities' (like yours) have been built and can be seen running.

 

Obscurities such as these..............

 

MerthyrRiverside001A.jpg.41e3bc7a254b61de3af4b369028c92d6.jpg

 

 

MercianSuperD.jpg.9731bec5186bec2536bd7d12e7f94c27.jpg

 

MerthyrRiverside006.jpg.aa99d96621b0724fad6a31db6c5f3f53.jpg

 

MR19.jpg.c380fbdfd38f7fef6d19abcc45969dd8.jpg

 

MerthyrRiverside007.jpg.f16c6555e6538dc8f71b8d78f3bd5f77.jpg

 

MerthyrRiverside011.jpg.18c31872e8fa3c66723a5eb128540006.jpg

 

Running on Rob Kinsey's Merthyr Riverside in EM, which will be at Expo EM North next month in Shipley.

 

How refreshing to see something so different from the current 'swamping' with RTR in the hobby.

 

I'll look through my photo library to see how many other images I have of locos built from 'obscure' kits. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

 

 

 

Looking at this model makes me wish I still lived in Huddersfield so I could pop over to Shipley. 

 

Oh well, Swansea isn't too bad especially when the airshow is on. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

How refreshing to see something so different from the current 'swamping' with RTR in the hobby.

 

Totally agree.  There is something especially inspiring in these layouts and models and it isn't only that everything has had to be kit or scratch-built.  It's that there is no-one alive who can recall the prototypes first-hand, so the research involved is so much more in-depth, which must be a very enjoyable exercise.  The fact that there is almost no colour record of the pre-1923 world requires a lot of research in itself.

 

I've never seen Merthyr Riverside at exhibition but although it's not the era or prototype that particularly interests me, I suspect it is one of those layouts that I would linger at for notably longer than some others.  Great modelling is great modelling, whatever the subject.

Edited by Northmoor
  • Like 4
  • Agree 6
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
20 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

Looking back at how I built that B&M 0-6-0ST (which appeared in BRM), the following pictures might be of interest.........

 

BM0-6-001.jpg.aa6a605589c1c47d864dce115d1285da.jpg

 

This is how the Redcraft kit appeared on emptying the contents of the box. The 'holes'  to take the axle bearings were just dimples!

 

BM0-6-002.jpg.d562e001d8aeb519d674ab5ade549c8f.jpg

 

Setting up the frames called for the old dodge of passing one eighth steel rods through the bearings, illuminating the set-up and then 'reading' the shadows; very 'old-school'. No etched tabs and slots here!

 

BM0-6-022.jpg.6cca70e7541c47984ba2249f86fa6547.jpg

 

The chassis completed.

 

See what I mean from yesterday of my 'dread' in having to dismantle all this to replace the motor? 

 

Fortunately, it was not required.

 

BM0-6-023.jpg.92000d8719d53695bb36b63f52df3732.jpg

 

BM0-6-024.jpg.468a1005ff7cf957428f8367c2fcbb14.jpg

 

I think it looked 'attractive' when completed.

 

BM0-6-025.jpg.13213aff82637c52d07b233d1556a8e8.jpg

 

And, when completed, Rob Kinsey painted it.

 

I have to say, having built about six locos with outside cranks, the prospect does not appeal to me. Every one has proved to be a time-consuming fiddle before satisfactory running has been achieved. 

 

I built two Gibson Buffalos for a customer once, and vowed 'never again'.

 

That said.........

 

GibsonBuffalo07.jpg.b534733c2f033a45f91f6f24a30780c3.jpg

 

I did build a third for one of Geoff Haynes' customers; obviously the body (with any brightwork left off until after Geoff had painted it), and also the frames. However, after that, he added the drive, wheels and cranks - I don't touch friction-fit drivers!

 

Romford/Markits are a different proposition, however..........

 

Nu-CastArmstrong09.jpg.1d04a6790fe9528e5802327cb4885956.jpg

 

And building these frames for a Nu-Cast Armstrong wasn't too daunting, though still more of a fiddle.

 

Nu-CastArmstrong17.jpg.1a8cb53719cd5745a35ae0ebecedc84f.jpg

 

In fact, the finished thing ran well. 

 

Built for another customer of Geoff's (this time in OO, rather than in EM), he then painted it.

 

But only after it............

 

Nu-CastArmstrong12.jpg.67b9b32fce2d0bd5f1e542fa12f10974.jpg

 

Nu-CastArmstrong14.jpg.9601d617438973300490033ec5cb799a.jpg

 

Had been thoroughly run-in on LB.

 

I've probably asked this question before, but what are others' experiences of outside-cranks? Is it just me who struggles with them?

 

Fortunately, for my own modelling, nothing I build requires them. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's never easy but does depend very much on how the cranks are made and fitted. The old Romford system with an extended 10BA thread was never very satisfactory although it can work, Gibson plastic cranks are a good push fit on plain axles and are easily adjusted but they are a bit on the chunky side. Our kits include shouldered axles and built up press on cranks, they work well enough but can be tricky to set accurately. Recently I've used the new Markits system, all machined and all screwed together, this works very well and is probably foolproof but in normal use is restricted to one axle length - not all outside cranks are at the same distance from the centre of the loco. This was amply demonstrated by my attempts to use (in 7mm) the Slater's crank system for an EE/HL 0-6-0DE, the system works perfectly but the axles are far too short.

One more point worth making is that most models with outside cranks, including rtr, have them far too wide - to the extent of fouling platforms and ground signals at times.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Omega models did a very nice looking slim boilered Johnson 4-4-0 kit that pops up on the bay for silly money from time to time.

Regards Lez.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Michael Edge said:

It's never easy but does depend very much on how the cranks are made and fitted. The old Romford system with an extended 10BA thread was never very satisfactory although it can work, Gibson plastic cranks are a good push fit on plain axles and are easily adjusted but they are a bit on the chunky side. Our kits include shouldered axles and built up press on cranks, they work well enough but can be tricky to set accurately. Recently I've used the new Markits system, all machined and all screwed together, this works very well and is probably foolproof but in normal use is restricted to one axle length - not all outside cranks are at the same distance from the centre of the loco. This was amply demonstrated by my attempts to use (in 7mm) the Slater's crank system for an EE/HL 0-6-0DE, the system works perfectly but the axles are far too short.

One more point worth making is that most models with outside cranks, including rtr, have them far too wide - to the extent of fouling platforms and ground signals at times.

Thanks Mike,

 

Bytham's platforms have been struck a few times by visiting locos with whirling outside cranks!

 

Though I wouldn't put your kits in the 'obscure' category, you've certainly produced some interesting ones. Including.........

 

Retford2382005Hunsletdieselshunter.jpg.ddb7ea589670e461d76c3061e60ad1da.jpg

 

This Hunslet diesel shunter, built by elder son Tom in his student days.

 

He built it in EM and it now runs on Retford (Sandra Orpen says she'll paint it one day!). 

 

He had it on display at one show and one observer would not accept that he'd built it (he was 19). 'That's your dad's work' he was told. He couldn't have been more wrong! 

 

I believe a couple of these actual locos were at Sheffield, so it's just possible one made it to Retford. 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Like 14
  • Craftsmanship/clever 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, lezz01 said:

Omega models did a very nice looking slim boilered Johnson 4-4-0 kit that pops up on the bay for silly money from time to time.

Regards Lez.

Thanks Lez,

 

I don't have any photographs of Omega's kits, I'm afraid.

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
7 minutes ago, Michael Edge said:

I had a similar experience years ago when my so David (aged 7) built this.

P1221476.JPG.eb748fc04ff8398b9fd681519e19658b.JPG

Not much detail and no fancy mechanical work, it's on a Triang Jinty mechanism with Romford wheels but he cut the parts out from my drawing, soldered it all up and painted it. He entered it in a model making competition at his junior school only to be disqualified because the teachers thought I had built it.

 

Should have brought in some of yours, then see it runs in the family.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

M&L did a range of GWR types............

 

Not only GW types, Tony.....

 

IMG_7928.jpeg.badfc885b2c6793407736e90e6d4c004.jpeg

 

I bought this many decades ago, as tender-only kit.  It is mainly whitemetal but includes etched parts for coal rails, guard irons and brake gear, and the etch includes all the etched parts for the loco as well!  As you can see, the instructions are those for the complete kit as well.

 

I must have had some purpose in mind for it when I bought it, but whatever that was it remains unbuilt to this day.

 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Grantham2209C1inPlatform5.jpg.b124dc9b9f871e0a4f1d3cada3105cb7.jpg.088eebd96b36fc06d6dc415ece7ebbc6.jpg

 

4 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

I think this is WSM, though it could be K's; over to you, Jonathan............

 

You are correct, Tony - it's the bulbous sides to the firebox which give it away.   It was built by the late Phil Giffen who was President of Ely club when I joined.   I have remotored and repainted it for Grantham use.

 

Are you sure Coopercraft did an F4?   I thought it was an F3 and have never seen one either built or unbuilt (though I have met someone who had one).  I have the frames from Paul Dunn's aborted project to relaunch the kit and one day I will complete it for use on the Framlingham branch train on Wickham Market.    At the moment my thinking is to find an unbuilt E4 and use that as the basis for it.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, MJI said:

 

Should have brought in some of yours, then see it runs in the family.

David's teachers were well aware of what I do for a living....

He had been sitting alongside me at my bench since he was 18 months old so he's actually had a long apprenticeship by then.

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jwealleans said:

Grantham2209C1inPlatform5.jpg.b124dc9b9f871e0a4f1d3cada3105cb7.jpg.088eebd96b36fc06d6dc415ece7ebbc6.jpg

 

 

You are correct, Tony - it's the bulbous sides to the firebox which give it away.   It was built by the late Phil Giffen who was President of Ely club when I joined.   I have remotored and repainted it for Grantham use.

 

Are you sure Coopercraft did an F4?   I thought it was an F3 and have never seen one either built or unbuilt (though I have met someone who had one).  I have the frames from Paul Dunn's aborted project to relaunch the kit and one day I will complete it for use on the Framlingham branch train on Wickham Market.    At the moment my thinking is to find an unbuilt E4 and use that as the basis for it.

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for that info Jonathan,

 

I'm not sure; it's what the photo is listed as, so (I assume) that's what I was told by the bloke who brought it; but, I can't remember whom.

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tony Wright said:

'm not sure; it's what the photo is listed as, so (I assume) that's what I was told by the bloke who brought it; but, I can't remember whom.

 

Now I look again, it looks more like an F3 and the number is certainly an F3: that's the one I was planning on building as it was the last survivor.   I'm not sure what's going on with that hatch behind the cab doors, though.

 

67127_stratford_03-05-53.jpg.db965ffba83030d40e3ee7b4e38710d2.jpg

 

 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Michael Edge said:

I had a similar experience years ago when my so David (aged 7) built this.

P1221476.JPG.eb748fc04ff8398b9fd681519e19658b.JPG

Not much detail and no fancy mechanical work, it's on a Triang Jinty mechanism with Romford wheels but he cut the parts out from my drawing, soldered it all up and painted it. He entered it in a model making competition at his junior school only to be disqualified because the teachers thought I had built it.

Good afternoon Mike,

 

My compliments on David's exceptional work (at such a tender age, too).

 

As well as Tom's work being questioned, I had to go into John's school (our younger son) to 'prove' that the photographs he'd presented to illustrate his GSE CDT project were taken by him, developed by him and printed by him. He ran the risk of his work being disqualified because the teacher told him they were 'clearly the work of a professional'. 

 

When I told the moderator that I was (as part of my job) a professional photographer, and that from an early age John had used a professional camera (a Nikon F), developed film and then printed the results, using my darkroom, he understood, and the work was duly credited. 

 

On a wider level, does anyone try to take credit for your work? The reason I ask is that someone (no names) didn't acknowledge that a loco was built by me when he was 'congratulated' on it being 'wonderful'!' Cheating', even by omission, is something I will not tolerate. That's why, every time I post pictures I give due credit.

 

On another occasion, a member of WMRC arrived one club night, proudly showing 'his' latest loco. Praise was justifiably given, and he just beamed. Not so much, however, when it was discovered it had been built/painted by a local professional (I thought I recognised the work). He didn't actually say it was 'his' work, but neither did he say that it wasn't. Such 'omissioners' (if there is such a word) eventually get rumbled! 

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Like 8
  • Round of applause 1
  • Friendly/supportive 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lezz01 said:

Then of course there are the two Ratio kits for the slim boilered 4-4-0 and the 2-4-0 which do make up into nice looking models. However you have to get creative with drive systems and weight as they are plastic. I've built 3 2-4-0s and have found that if you put the motor in the tender and drive through a UJ to the loco which you can then fill with lead plus replacing all of the boiler fittings with brass or WM castings you can get them to pull a train quite well. The second issue of both of these kits are a vast improvement on the originals as they had a Perseverance chassis. The original 4-4-0 chassis is particularly useless but the 2-4-0 chassis is just about usable. My avatar is one of the 2-4-0s I built and painted myself. I have a couple of both types in stock but given Gibson's price hike it now costs over £30 for the boiler fittings and the availability of both types from LRM I think that the 2-4-0s will be bashed into Kirtley 800 class DF 2-4-0s.

I have some photos of the 2 locos I sold on ebay some years ago. 

Here's 239. sorry about the photo quality.

100_0363.jpg.af29e2a866bdfd4df289e04ab979e4d9.jpg

   Here's 254 which was my first attempt at the simplified Deeley livery.  100_0416.jpg.c0aaecc584df204214b9839b265cfef7.jpg

Both are EM and both are not very good photos they were taken with a Kodak digital camera which to be honest wasn't very good.

I don't have any photos of the third one I built which is a shame as it had all the drive train mods and worked well and had a better paint job as I changed the way I approached the issue of lining as seen on 239.

Regards Lez.  

Thanks for those Lez,

 

Though I once had a Ratio 2-4-0 kit for sale, I never took its picture. 

 

I wonder how many folk actually got them to work?

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jwealleans said:

 

Now I look again, it looks more like an F3 and the number is certainly an F3: that's the one I was planning on building as it was the last survivor.   I'm not sure what's going on with that hatch behind the cab doors, though.

 

67127_stratford_03-05-53.jpg.db965ffba83030d40e3ee7b4e38710d2.jpg

 

 

Thanks Jonathan,

 

I'll amend my picture's description.

 

Regards,

 

Tony

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...