Jump to content
 

Grantham - the Streamliner years


LNER4479
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yep, there was a touch of humour in my post though.

 

Thing is, why not bring the USA product into line with what they sold in Britain, making them Marathon bars on both sides of the pond (and presumably in every other country as well).

 

Because they are a BIG market and we are a small one... I'll leave any possible political ramifications of that statement at the door as I grab my coat... ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyhow ...

 

Layout all safely transported to Wakefield, set up and miraculously working OK with minimal fuss. Nicely settled down during the evening's running and ready to go - all being well - in the morning.

 

We've already had a first running of the Stirling No.1 1888 train recreation and the set of coaches below, both of which performed splendidly.

 

Great show with other star layouts there and friendly atmosphere. DO say hi if you're coming along.

post-16151-0-49868200-1542406830_thumb.jpg

Edited by LNER4479
  • Like 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree - very good standard of layouts at the show.

 

As always, I enjoyed watching Grantham.

 

Hope the barriers don’t creep up on you again though!

 

Thank you to everyone for the time spent talking, explaining and showing.

 

Off to watch the DVD now.

 

Jon

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree - very good standard of layouts at the show.

As always, I enjoyed watching Grantham.

Hope the barriers don’t creep up on you again though!

Thank you to everyone for the time spent talking, explaining and showing.

Off to watch the DVD now.

Jon

Barrier creep shows how many are leaning on them to view the layout!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Congratulations G on providing a stage for the two very worthy award winners 'work. Both items are quite admirable in their own right. It looks as thought he layout itself is creating a great (Northern?) reputation for itself as well. 

Do take care at Warley as the madding crowds can be a PITA come mid Sunday when all one wants is a lie down after a stiff drink, in my past experience.

All the best and I hope to catch up with you after the festering season.

Phil

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff from John, Roy and Jonathan. 2750 might be the 'forgotten' hero of the time - but not forgotten by us. I regard her as one of the four iconic pacifics from the era that are routinely requested from Mark Allatt's collection, the others of course being 4472, 4468 and 4498 (I'm sure I don't need to quote the names of those three). If we're talking iconic, then 2509 should be added to that list as well but - happily - we also now have her as part of the regular stud in any case, thanks to Barry O.

 

A few more random thoughts about No.2750 and March 5th 1935.

 

The contrast between her performance - as an A3 - and the Nov 1934 run of 4472 - as an original A1 - was there for all to see. Many believe that No.4472 didn't actually achieve the magic 100 on her run, the trace from the dynamometer car otherwise holding steady at @98mph but for a momentary blip up to 100 that defies the laws of physics. But No.2750 was so far over the line (as the historical article outlines) as to put it beyond doubt - and with a heavier train. And with the same driver! The legendary Mr Sparshatt.

 

The running - southbound in particular - is of particular note because it was a day of sustained high-speed. By contrast, Mallard's great day was little more than 11 minutes of all out thrash and done with. The concentration required of a driver, in the dirty, vibrating and deafening environment of a steam locomotive cab travelling at speed, to coax the maximum performance whilst dutifully observing every signal and calculating ahead for each approaching speed restriction - all of which would be memorised in his head - for four hours without a break is quite extraordinary and not often fully appreciated. And this was a man who had already travelled north earlier in the day so was well in to a long day. No wonder he got such a hero's welcome upon return to The Cross.

 

5th March to 27th September 1935. That was the total time elapsed between this run and the public debut of No.2509, the first of the A4s. Must be unparalleled in railway history as so short a design and manufacture period for such a significant locomotive type. Which then went straight into service and handled the first three weeks of the new service without any back up until the next loco was available. Quite extraordinary.

 

Did I read or hear somewhere that Mr Pegler's first expression of interest in 1963 was actually for No.2750 (BR 60096)? But finding that it had already been condemned, he then switched to No.4472. The rest, as they say...

 

Without doubt, No.2750 and the events of 5th March 1935 definitely worth remembering and celebrating.

Edited by LNER4479
  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Its on the web site but to make it easy for you here is the full list

 

Demo. For all Scales  -  Ian Mellors  Loco and stock servicing A061  RedgateModels

Demo. For all Scales  - fitting DCC chips  Simon Howard A060 Mr.S.corn78

Demo. For all Scales - Gordon Gravett  Static Grass and ground cover A059

Demo. For all scales - Graham Nicholas - Layout Planning A067  LNER4479

Demo. For all scales - Soldering - Andy Duncan A066

Demo. Materials in Modelling -  Ian Morris 3D Printing A055

Demo. Materials in Modelling - Andy  Morris 3D Printing A054  Innocentman

Demo. Materials in modelling - Mike Edge Etched Kit Design and construction A053 Mike Edge

Demo. Materials in Modelling - Resin Casting Graeme King A056  GRKing

Demo. Materials in modelling: whitemetal kit building  Tony Wright A052 Tony Wright

Demo. Meet the expert - Bob Harper Modelling the Maine 2 footers A065

Demo. Meet the expert - Jonathan Wealleans - building 4mm wagons A064  JWealleans

Demo. Shows You How - Kendal MRC C047

Demo. Warley MRC - Ian Rathbone painting and lining in the smaller scales A049

Demo. Warley MRC - Ian Woodward coach building A051

Demo. Warley MRC - Paul Stokes  S7 demo A058

Demo. Warley MRC - RDE Brown - Digital design techniques across the scales A050 

Demo. Warley MRC -Barry Oliver -Weathering A057  BarryO

Demo.Meet the expert  2mm locos and wagon building  - Jerry Clifford A063 Queen Square

Demo. Meet the expert - Peter Kazer  Narrow Gauge Modelling A062

 

 

baz

 

Does that help???

Edited by Barry O
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff from John, Roy and Jonathan. 2750 might be the 'forgotten' hero of the time - but not forgotten by us. 

 

A few more random thoughts about No.2750 and March 5th 1935.

 

The contrast between her performance - as an A3 - and the Nov 1934 run of 4472 - as an original A1 - was there for all to see. Many believe that No.4472 didn't actually achieve the magic 100 on her run, the trace from the dynamometer car otherwise holding steady at @98mph but for a momentary blip up to 100 that defies the laws of physics. But No.2750 was so far over the line (as the historical article outlines) as to put it beyond doubt - and with a heavier train. And with the same driver! The legendary Mr Sparshatt.

 

The running - southbound in particular - is of particular note because it was a day of sustained high-speed. By contrast, Mallard's great day was little more than 11 minutes of all out thrash and done with. The concentration required of a driver, in the dirty, vibrating and deafening environment of a steam locomotive cab travelling at speed, to coax the maximum performance whilst dutifully observing every signal and calculating ahead for each approaching speed restriction - all of which would be memorised in his head - for four hours without a break is quite extraordinary and not often fully appreciated. And this was a man who had already travelled north earlier in the day so was well in to a long day. No wonder he got such a hero's welcome upon return to The Cross.

 

5th March to 27th September 1935. That was the total time elapsed between this run and the public debut of No.2509, the first of the A4s. Must be unparalleled in railway history as so short a design and manufacture period for such a significant locomotive type. Which then went straight into service and handled the first three weeks of the new service without any back up until the next loco was available. Quite extraordinary.

 

Did I read or hear somewhere that Mr Pegler's first expression of interest in 1963 was actually for No.2750 (BR 60096)? But finding that it had already been condemned, he then switched to No.4472. The rest, as they say...

 

Without doubt, No.2750 and the events of 5th March 1935 definitely worth remembering and celebrating.

 

Graham,

 

You are not quite correct about Mr Sparshatt on 5-3-1935.

 

On the 4472 run to Leeds the Crew, Sparshatt and Webster worked both ways.

 

It was realised that this was too much for the fireman, at the very least. The crew from the November 4472 run only worked the 2750 train south from Newcastle, but that included the record 108 of course.

 

All I can say about the 4472 run is beware 'Gentlemen' with stop-watches. They are more accurate than the most up-to-date and calibrated technology of the day.

 

There was a whole publishing industry based on this. 

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Graham,

 

You are not quite correct about Mr Sparshatt on 5-3-1935.

 

On the 4472 run to Leeds the Crew, Sparshatt and Webster worked both ways.

 

It was realised that this was too much for the fireman, at the very least. The crew from the November 4472 run only worked the 2750 train south from Newcastle, but that included the record 108 of course.

 

All I can say about the 4472 run is beware 'Gentlemen' with stop-watches. They are more accurate than the most up-to-date and calibrated technology of the day.

 

There was a whole publishing industry based on this. 

 

John

Thanks John.

 

I knew he didn't work the 6th March train northwards - the historical article that Jonathan pointed us to makes that clear. But, being a King's Cross man, did he not ride out on the cushions in the morning? That was what I was referring to. Or had he lodged in Newcastle the night before?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks John.

 

I knew he didn't work the 6th March train northwards - the historical article that Jonathan pointed us to makes that clear. But, being a King's Cross man, did he not ride out on the cushions in the morning? That was what I was referring to. Or had he lodged in Newcastle the night before?

 

Graham, I misinterpreted your statement. My guess is the crew did indeed travel north the same day.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...