Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

Early Risers.


Mr.S.corn78
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
28 minutes ago, Winslow Boy said:

Oh don't you go all technical on me Bear. Green and spiky. Green and Spiky. You'll be saying what type of green it is next. Have you cut the grass yet?

 

Proper green like the GWR, or the odd, soapy greens preferred by the likes of the Southern and LNER? Or that sort of bronze green favoured by the Highland Railway? 🤔

 

Exit, stage left.....  🤪🤪🤪

 

  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Goodnight all 

  • Thanks 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hroth said:

 

Proper green like the GWR, or the odd, soapy greens preferred by the likes of the Southern and LNER? Or that sort of bronze green favoured by the Highland Railway? 🤔

 

Exit, stage left.....  🤪🤪🤪

 

Oh Lord another one. That's all we need.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 5
  • Funny 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, pH said:

This is it

What is that? Fraser Fir?

 

It's too bushy for a Douglas Fir - unless that's because it didn't grow "naturally".

 

Edited by Ozexpatriate
  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
6 hours ago, Ozexpatriate said:

I think that assertion is really about the insanity* of approving Barbarossa at all - rather than the logistical details - particularly the reversal of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. I still can't help but think Stalin would have been content to coexist with a Nazi occupied western-Europe.

 

* Particularly with the glaringly obvious Napoleonic precedent.

 

One presumes after the failure of Sea Lion, *something* needed to be done to per perpetuate the mythos and maintain a war footing.

 

Of course it was suggested in the jail-authored 'my struggles' (which I won't quote literally).

 

There was a sort of bonkers inverse logic. Putting aside the deep hatred of the USSR among senior national socialists the military 'logic' appears to have been that Britain's hope was that the Soviets would go to war with Germany and open a second front (the great heresy of German thinking after their WW1 experience) so the answer was to...open a second front against the USSR to bring Britain to its senses.

 

However, at a strictly practical level, German planners were fully aware of multiple issues which made invading the USSR a bad idea (put simply they were biting more than they could chew even in 1941 when conditions were better for them than they'd ever be again in the war) yet their answer was to just assume everything would work and they'd achieve a quick victory anyway. And that wasn't conforming with a political decision, the German planners themselves had a lazy assumption that they would win based on complete self assurance (a bit like the Sardaukar in Dune). A matter which has recieved more attention in recent years is the divergence between Adolf and the Generals on strategic aim. Halder et al were obsessed with taking Moscow, Adolf wanted to take the rich economic prizes of Ukraine and Leningrad and saw Moscow as a secondary objective to be taken after securing the North and South. So they basically planned a campaign around Moscow, ignoring the political directives assuming it'd all work out which had terrible results for Germany in the summer of 1941 as it created a sort of political paralysis for a short but key period in the campaign. Whether the generals were right or wrong (it's highly unlikely taking Moscow would have triggered a Soviet collapse) their objection wasn't to invading the Soviets but rather the strategy proposed.

 

In his book 'The Blitzkrieg Legend' the German official historian Karl-Heinz Frieser posited that the quick victory in France had catastrophic consequences for Germany as it convinced their generals that tactical and operational planning could substitute for strategy and inculcated a belief in short, sharp campaigns.

  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

In fairness Donald can't be blamed for the collapse of Eastern, he bought part of a failed airline which subsequently failed but Eastern was already a corpse. Frank Lorenzo is the guy to blame for that wreck.

  • Like 3
  • Informative/Useful 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Ozexpatriate said:

What is that? Fraser Fir?

 

It's too bushy for a Douglas Fir - unless that's because it didn't grow "naturally".

 


I couldn’t be more specific than “conifer” 🙄. However, those who know tell me it’s a spruce of some kind.

  • Like 13
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, jjb1970 said:

Halder et al were obsessed with taking Moscow, Adolf wanted to take the rich economic prizes of Ukraine and Leningrad and saw Moscow as a secondary objective to be taken after securing the North and South.

I distinctly remember the 1970s "World At War" documentary series emphasizing the shift south east from Moscow - after not taking the city quickly following Zukov's counter-offensive before the end of 1941) as being related to capturing the oil fields of "the Caucasus" - a bit vague, though Azerbaijan did represent 80% of Soviet oil supplies at that time. (Of course in the 1970s no one talked about "Azerbaijan".)

 

Operation Operation Edelweiß (the primary objective being Baku) was the plan by the summer of 1942. Rostov-on-Don (east of Ukraine, on the NE corner of the Sea of Azov and the "Gates of the Caucasus) fell in July of 1942.

 

Kazakhstan was oil rich as well and Volgograd / Stalingrad is the 'gateway' to Kazakhstan from the west - it is 150 km from the Kazakh border.

 

(I'm presuming in your post you meant Stalingrad rather than Leningrad. The Wehrmacht laid siege to Leningrad in September 1941, essentially abandoning the siege to press on to Moscow in the Autumn of 1941.  Leningrad was a primary objective of Operation Barbarossa from the beginning.)

 

Edited by Ozexpatriate
  • Like 14
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Posted (edited)

Mooring Awl,

3.5 hours sleep short awake, 1 hours sleep short awake. 3 hours sleep a good total for me.

 

So I took Ben the sleepy Collie out an hour early, everything dripping wet due to a recent rain shower, puddles aren't at maximum. He's now on the first dose of the reduced amount of his pills, second today, he seemed a little stiff this morning, but that happens occasionally anyway.

 

Random thoughts of sign placing have occured, as there are two more than last time. In 15 minutes I depart.. upsetting Ben the snoring Collie.

 

That spitfire that unfortunately crashed was formerly the gate guardian aka plane on a stick, at RAF Locking, where ground  radar, comms , and simulator techs were trained.

 

If they bring back national service they are going to have to close all the asylum seekers ex military bases and reopen them for the military.. RAF Locking for instance has been demolished like many others and turned into a housing estate and RAF Coltishall is now a prison.

 

Time to finish this muggacoffee.

Edited by TheQ
  • Like 15
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hroth said:

Its almost as if a certain political party doesn't want to win the election...

 

The return of National Service

 

Oh, I don’t know. Switzerland still has National Service (and after your initial service you are required to be in the reserves and undergo yearly 2-week “refreshers [for want of a better word] until your 40s) and it seems to work out. The (sadly early deceased) partner of our Swiss vet friend was a lawyer defending or prosecuting criminal cases and he claims (and I have no reason to doubt his veracity) the majority of the criminals were foreigners - the Swiss being but a small proportion of the incarcerated. This, he claims, is partly due to the discipline and values imbued during National Service.

 

Whilst, traditionally, a large military - with/without National Service - was a good way of thinning out that troublesome male age group (mid teens to early 30s), today’s sensibilities no longer allow for campaigns in far off places with plenty of casualties. And the sort of casualty rates considered as acceptable in Victorian and Edwardian times would have The Guardian and soshul meeja go into meltdown.

 

Whilst National Service does have many positives, these are only achieved if everyone does National Service (and in these enlightened times that includes Women). But Britain being the way that it is, I suspect that little Tarquin and Clarissa’s upper middle class, Guardian-reading, Islington parents will find plenty of ways to get their little darlings off doing National Service; the Kevs and Tracies from the tower blocks and council estates will have no such options.

 

Not that I’m cynical or anything…

  • Like 3
  • Agree 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, polybear said:

 

Bear wears the fancy socks on LH and goes for regular walks.  Seems to work ok so far 

 

 

Oh yes, and cut the hedges too (including the neighbour's sides - not that I ever get anything to scoff for my trouble 😢).

Do try to keep up.....

 

 

It also instils a feeling of "if it ain't busted, don't fix it"

Cunning.

 

 

Forcing Teenagers to do things they have absolutely no interest in doing - which will just make them a PITA for the Organisations concerned.

There's one guy (a Volunteer in his 40's/50's?) at the Hospice Warehouse that already has a reputation for being unreliable and not turning up when promised, meaning one of the Drivers is left without help (not funny).  As a result he's asked to volunteer less as he's just not dependable.

 

 

Tall green spiky one.

Now now my Dear Bear don't go getting all touchy and everything. You are at least going out in the garden- that's the green space by the way where the green things are (see what I'm doing there) so you do at least get credit for that.

 

And about doing the hedge - neighbours side, you shouldn't be so antisocial. That's typical of you young Bears nowadays. If your going to do a job that should be reward enough.

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Hroth said:

 

Proper green like the GWR,

It’s SO refreshing to stumble across the odd corner of sanity on ER…

10 hours ago, Winslow Boy said:

Oh Lord another one. That's all we need.

Indeed we do, Winnie Old Boy.

 

Be not misled by that entity that currently goes by the misnomer of GWR. That “Train Operating Company” (put in quotes for reasons that regular users of that service can attest to) bears no resemblance to the real thing.

 

No, the one, the true and the only GWR (d. 1948) provided excellent services and took good care of its employees (although, perhaps, not paying them abundantly. But which railway company did back then?). Folded into BR, the GWR managed to retain a lot of  its identity as BR(WR).
 

Then armageddon happened: Britain privatised its railways: badly, short-sightedly and incompetently….

 

Edited by iL Dottore
Completed sentence
  • Like 11
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Round of applause 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Cloud-sunshine-rain-now sunshine again but about to cloud over.

 

Just had a call from Thames Water, "engineers" should be phoning shortly.

 

Cake baked and now cooling.

  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just read this in Jay Rayner’s restaurant review column:

 

Customers at the Coronation pub in Southville will be charged 30p extra per drink if they order them in person at the bar, as against ordering via a QR code and having them delivered to their table. Landlord Ben Cheshire explained to the Telegraph that it was better for his staff. ‘This takes the stress away rather than having to constantly interact with different people for eight hours straight,’ he said>
(my underline).

 

I reckon that that landlord needs to get mentally tougher staff. In the 60s, 70s and 80s I don’t recall reading any accounts of teenagers and young people having stress related breakdowns working in a pub. (Certainly there were other problems, but… stress from interacting with other people???)

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 15
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...