Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

Early Risers.


Mr.S.corn78
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
7 minutes ago, Happy Hippo said:

 

 

Since human flesh and pork is supposedly similar, you can understand the reason that they want to plant their deceased within 48 hours of death.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I hope your not suggesting cannibalism.:jester:

Edited by PhilJ W
  • Funny 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
48 minutes ago, Gwiwer said:

Morning Jamie - do you mind if I send SWMBO over?  She is wearing a job lot of dental putty over a badly broken molar because there is no service of any kind here.  The Gummint suggested they would set up emergency clinics with PPE precautions but only two seem to exist and both are only taking referrals from their own patient lists.  So - no tooth wrangling of any sort for the duration although there are suggestions that more urgent-treatment locations will open in June or July.  

I hope she gets sorted out soon Rick.  You would of coursecbe welcome to send her over but the next available appointments with DrcDecran are towards the end of June.

 

Talk of specific slang. There was even different slang between us donkey wallopers,as we were known in the county, and the city slickers. In Leeds, thieves were known as gannifs, which I believe is a corruption of a yiddish word. The pits also had their own language.  Galliwer for a pit pony for instance, and if someone was seen running, it was said that they were trying to catch the last rope.  That was a reference to the fact that each trip of the cage was known as a rope. Man riding ropes at the start and finish of each shift were wound slower than production ropes. When Saville Colliery was in production on my patch, they ran at 72 ropes per hour.  If you missed the last man riding rope you didn't get paid for the shift. As an aside it was a joy to watch a skilled winding engine man at work.

 

Jamie

  • Like 11
  • Informative/Useful 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, PhilJ W said:

......Quite often fish featured quite strongly with red meat rarely if ever. This was often backed up by the finding in rubbish pits of the food remains of shellfish and other fish remains. Add to that that a piscean diet is healthier even than a vegetarian diet, a vegan diet is actually the unhealthiest. This leads me to conclude that our ancestors diet was fish based rather than red meat...

In evolutionary biology one of the hypotheses is that, at some point during our evolution, we were semi-acquatic, with a number of things supporting that hypothesis: firstly, the way our body hair aligns itself/lies along our bodies is more characteristic of aquatic mammals than non-acquatic mammals (the next time you go for swim with your dog, note how more aerodynamic [aquadynamic?] your body hair is when wet than Fido’s); secondly a semi-aquatic existence would  have provided early humans with easy access to abundant fish and seafood - a rich source of the fatty acids needed for big brain development (a theory supported by archaeological findings of huge seaside middens containing hundreds and thousands of shellfish shells).

 

There have been some interesting investigations into the diet of early humans. One examined how a group of humans would manage living, primarily on fruit, raw vegetables, berries and nuts without the ability to cook and without access to meat (postulated as the pre-fire-use diet of early humans). The volunteers all quit one or two weeks into the experiment, not because of malnutrition (specialists had calculated how much fruit, raw vegetables, berries and nuts they HAD to eat each day to remain healthy), but because to avoid malnutrition, volunteers would need to be eating the completely raw diet 8 - 12 hours/day. And, for various reasons, the volunteers just couldn’t do it. 
 

Modern humans can’t eat like a proto human, cooking food and access to readily available protein (Meat, fish) has changed our gut over the centuries as these two things allowed for a bigger calorific and nutritional intake in a much shorter period of time in a much more easily digestible form. Most of our nearest relatives, the various great apes, when observed in the wild, are seen to be spending the best part of their day eating - simply to get enough nourishment.
 

Another interesting insight into the role of foodstuffs in the way we, as humans, have developed over time, comes from the work of forensic archaeologists (the correct term?). In one study I read about, they compared the skeletal remains of humans who lived in the first “towns” (basically large villages) with the skeletal remains of hunter gatherers from the same time period. Knowing that the townsfolk were eating a predominantly grain, fruit and vegetable-based diet with minimal meat (a type of diet recommended today by nutritionists), they expected the townspeople to be healthier than the hunter gatherers – who lived primarily on the meats they caught, eked out by found berries, nuts, fruit and funghi. To the researchers surprise they found that, overall, the hunter gatherers were much healthier (and taller!) than the townspeople who had evidence of suffering from many of those diseases, such as diabetes and nutritional deficiencies, associated with a poor diet. ThIs was a most unexpected result, given that the researchers were initially expecting the townsfolk with their “ideal“ diet to have been healthier than their hunter gatherer counterparts.
 

I think it would be interesting to compare the amount of time spent preparing and cooking food (from raw ingredients) between predominantly meat eating cultures and predominantly vegetarian cultures. I suspect the vegetarian cultures will be spending a lot more time in the selection of foodstuffs to make up a balanced diet as well as the preparation and the cooking thereof than meat eaters.

 

As much as I am a carnivore, access to abundant and varied seafood and fish, would certainly entice me to becoming a pisceterian. Unfortunately, not a viable option here in Switzerland.
 

Cheers

 

iD

  • Like 9
  • Informative/Useful 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
7 hours ago, iL Dottore said:

For me, one of the best interpretations of some of the music of this era is in Linda Ronstadt’s ‘Round Midnight: a Box set of the three albums she recorded with the Nelson Riddle Orchestra (band leader and arranger who worked with, amongst others, Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, Nat King Cole). The title track being particularly atmospheric, evoking - for me - a sense of a cold, wet, Autumn evening in Chicago, viewed from within a warm bar, with a glass of bourbon in hand... Heartily recommended.

 

Funny that you should mention that album, Flavio - it's one that is near to the top and front of my CD cabinet, and is never all that far from my CD player, as it is also one of my favourite recordings.

 

  • Like 10
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon all,

 

Another cool and dull day here, but plenty outside has been done.  Newly constructed cold frame has been painted, a third row of pea seeds planted, some weeding done, and more wood moved from condemned shed to alternative storage behind the garage.  There might just be enough space behind the garage for all the wood I plan to move there.  We may have been in lockdown for nearly 8 weeks, but there still seems to be plenty to do around the place.

 

Now it is time to head back outside for the next task, which is probably more weeding!

  • Like 17
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Coombe Barton said:
9 hours ago, Ozexpatriate said:

Water for food chart

Could you please tell me the source of this information? It's something I can use.

I'll send you a note. I'm happy to share the spreadsheet. I compiled it some years ago and (foolishly) did not make notes on sources. This was done mostly for my own understanding. It was inspired by a National Geographic articles about water consumption (there were several over the years) and what it takes to feed >7 billion people. I suspect in the end there were multiple sources (print and online) and the data may contain errors.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, iL Dottore said:

In evolutionary biology one of the hypotheses is that, at some point during our evolution, we were semi-acquatic,

Presumably pre-H. Sapiens primates? I had thought the H. xxxx, proto-humans were land locked great rift valley primates, which would be inconsistent with being notionally semi-aquatic.

  • Like 9
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jargon, Argot, Cant, Slang, secret languages and Idiom.

 

Differentiating between these terms is difficult and I may misuse them unintentionally. Any "in-group" (often professional) creates its own jargon. A couple of examples mentioned were military, the professional railway.  My own professional career had its own set of jargon which meant something in context but did not have the same precise meaning in the wider world.

 

As model railway hobbyists we adopt a lot of railway jargon that is unfamiliar to most people. Sports is of course the source of a copious amount of jargon. Regional slang using expressions incomprehensible to outsiders (often deliberately so, a good example is the "thieves' cant") is common as well. Every generation of teenagers seems to create its own slang as a secret language. My favourite parody of sports jargon is the late (and greatly missed Kiwi) John Clarke's sport of farnarkling.

 

Then there's adopting a foreign (particularly minority) language that can become idiomatic. Borrowing Yiddish words is a good example in North American early - mid-20th century comedy.

 

Creating "tribal" markers for language is a very human thing.

 

Edited by Ozexpatriate
  • Like 16
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Ozexpatriate said:

Presumably pre-H. Sapiens primates? I had thought the H. xxxx, proto-humans were land locked great rift valley primates, which would be inconsistent with being notionally semi-aquatic.

Not necessarily, once H Sapiens had emerged from the Rift Valley the species continued to evolve - so an evolutionary “seaside excursion” is more than feasible. One thing is for certain, our evolutionary pathway is definitely not linear.

  • Like 10
  • Agree 3
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozexpatriate said:

Presumably pre-H. Sapiens primates? I had thought the H. xxxx, proto-humans were land locked great rift valley primates, which would be inconsistent with being notionally semi-aquatic.

 

AAH was popular sixty years ago but it's largely discredited now.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/aquatic_ape_hypothesis

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Happy Hippo said:

Unable to visit the barbers, I have decided to try one of the finest known American hair styles:

 

image.png.4c9c1fb7c5741e1d2dab72d2b095f33c.png

 

Just need the pickup, and a hound (I got the guns) y'all.

 

I told you I have hair that just won't quit. Where did you find that photo?

  • Funny 15
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dave Hunt said:

 

Later this morning the Midland Railway Society committee members are going to try out a Skype get-together as a dry run for a potential committee meeting next week.

 

Should we assume you will all be wearing period costume?

 

:)

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Funny 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AndyID said:

 

AAH was popular sixty years ago but it's largely discredited now.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/aquatic_ape_hypothesis

Thanks for the link, most interesting. However, from reading the Wikipedia entry, I conclude that it IS a contentious theory and many (not all) “mainstream” researchers think the theory is rubbish; but, as cited in the Wiki page, other evolutionary theories - such as H sapiens emerging from the forest onto the Savannah, are equally tenuous, but practically “evolutionary gospel” until Tobias’s critique in 1995, The problem being the speculation is about soft-tissue and hair changes, things notably absent from the fossil record....

 

But isn’t this the beauty of science? Making the best possible hypothesis from the available data collected by the technology of the day, only to have it modified, turned upside down or even negated by newer data collected by newer technologies. 

 

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, iL Dottore said:

Thanks for the link, most interesting. However, from reading the Wikipedia entry, I conclude that it IS a contentious theory and many (not all) “mainstream” researchers think the theory is rubbish; but, as cited in the Wiki page, other evolutionary theories - such as H sapiens emerging from the forest onto the Savannah, are equally tenuous, but practically “evolutionary gospel” until Tobias’s critique in 1995, The problem being the speculation is about soft-tissue and hair changes, things notably absent from the fossil record....

 

But isn’t this the beauty of science? Making the best possible hypothesis from the available data collected by the technology of the day, only to have it modified, turned upside down or even negated by newer data collected by newer technologies. 

 

 

I wouldn't call it a theory in the scientific sense. No one will ever disprove the existence of aquatic ancestors just as no one will ever disprove the existence of Bigfoot.

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...