Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

Early Risers.


Mr.S.corn78
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

As Mr Hunt would put it, the haunted fish tank has been blasting out inane carp since we cleared away after our evening meal. Happily for me, I have managed to let her watch all the sh!t that is her diet in such matters whilst I have received my Luminar 4 software and have been going through that and a tiny bit of my various libraries of photographs taken since the start of the millennium - I will now use a phrase attributed to Captain Oates: I may be some time. Time for a small libation and a bit of eyelid inspection, peaceful and healing nights to all.

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, New Haven Neil said:

IIRC the detected emissions were radiated back up the aerial - from a friend who worked in the TV business, the transmitters in his case.

 

I think that is the case. Energy emitted by the telly should be coupled into the aerial by magnetic induction from the fly-back transformer's stray field. The shield on the coax down-lead is effective against some RF coupling but not magnetic induction.

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a flock of around ten or more turkeys taking the berries off the barberry bushes outside my window. They do tend to carp all over the place but I don't have the heart to shoo them away.

 

1 hour ago, Gwiwer said:

It doesn't solve the problems of small trains not behaving but it does make one feel better from the inside out. 

 

You might want to take a look at Dead Rail. Batteries are not yet sufficient to power express trains (in 00) but they might be more than adequate for small layouts. I'm seriously considering using them for station pilots and shunters on an otherwise DC layout.

 

  • Like 10
  • Informative/Useful 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, roundhouse said:

The BBC  channels do not have advertsing  unlike other channels. This (in brief) means that in order to pay for the BBC, anyone in the UK who is watching any TV has to have a TV license by law. There are exceptions such as those over 75 but thats a very moot point at the moment as thats due to be withdrawn.

 

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know what happened with the above but in response................

     I was working in TV at the time of the introduction of ITV in the Plymouth area from Hessary Tor and one of the favourite excuses was, "but we don't watch the BBC, only ITV!"  The reasoning being ITV had commercials so why pay for a licence for the BBC which seemed to have some merit.  IIRC, it was only a fiver in those days, very cheap anyway compared with todays licence.

     Brian.

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
5 minutes ago, Stubby47 said:

Thought for the day:

 

If we are a carbon-based life form and we breath oxygen, then why is carbon monoxide so deadly?

I do know why but don’t want to be accused of mansplaining!

  • Agree 1
  • Funny 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stubby47 said:

Thought for the day:

 

If we are a carbon-based life form and we breath oxygen, then why is carbon monoxide so deadly?

 

Good question! But which is  more deadly? Carbon monoxide, or carbon dioxide?

 

CO might kill a few of us but CO2 might well kill all of us. It's probably a case of picking your poison.

  • Like 6
  • Agree 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Ozexpatriate said:

Carbon monoxide is certainly much quicker (and more toxic).

 

Quicker yes, but unless you believe CO2 does not contribute to the greenhouse effect it's likely to destroy human civilization faster than anything.

 

  • Like 6
  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 hours ago, Gwiwer said:

You could only do that once.  Maybe.  There was a trick known to signalmen and those among us who were invited into various 'boxes by the "Bobby" on occasions.  A discreet lifting of the box-to-box phone six times would produce six clicks at the receiving end.  Had six bells been sent on the block instrument the bobby might have been working his last shift and on a serious charge given that no obstruction nor danger existed.  But six clicks on the phone was understood to mean - as the local Cornish boys would say - "Specked az bowt" :O  At which point anyone without reasonable business in the box would be hastily ushered out and told to "Go that way".  In the opposite direction to potentially prying eyes.

 

 

Quite easy to catch them numerous times when they couldn't see you coming and in any case quite a lot of them were usually nattering on the 'bus line (omnibus circuits where everybody on one circuit could be in on a conversation at the same time - absolutely brilliant idea because you never got an engaged tone when calling somebody and if they didn't answer their 'phone somebody else would tell you where they were).   But that was the simple stuff, the really subtle stuff was how a Signalman could let an adjacent box that somebody was about when you were actually in the 'box and they were nowhere near the 'phones - usually because I was near them going through the book.   And being equally subtle if I wanted an adjacent 'box to know that I was about I could do that just as easily without going anywhere near a 'phone if the opportunity presented itself.  And if there wasn't a chance for the Signalman to use the subtle method it was usually very easy to catch out the Signalman at an adjacent 'box if he didn't know that I was out and about.

 

It was a good job the blokes on the Salisbury - Exeter line didn't use a 6 on the box-to-box 'phones (that route was the only place we actually had any on our patch, they weren't very common in older Western 'boxes) because they used them as 'block bells' in everyday working to let the 'box in advance know when a train was entering the section.

  • Informative/Useful 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Just west of Ian, we have varied frozen water forecast, but just had a couple of hours of rain.

 

Dayle thinks she may have picked something up at the opera yesterday as the soprano in La Bohème was coughing rather badly.

 

 

  • Friendly/supportive 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AndyID said:

... it's likely to destroy human civilization faster than anything

We have plenty of alternative and catastrophic ways of doing that very quickly.

 

A friend of mine lives in a Rocky Mountain state. Home prices where he lives are skyrocketing because there is a nearby Air Force base (mostly underground) where all the equipment is being refreshed and an influx of military contractors is underway.

 

For some strange reason this popped into my head: "Mandrake, do you recall what Clemenceau once said about war?" ... "He said war was too important to be left to the generals. When he said that, 50 years ago, he might have been right. But today, war is too important to be left to politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought."

 

I'm not diminishing the impact of climate change but it will take quite some time to "destroy human civilization". It is a death by a thousand cuts. Human ingenuity and tenaciousness (like all the dykes / seawalls and road raising being constructed in Miami*) will delay the inevitable for decades. Many micro-economies will change dramatically. I can imagine the California wine industry collapsing and Oregon planting Cabernet instead of Pinot Noir as the region warms and weather patterns change. It will be interesting to see how sea-level rise impacts access to fresh water in the western US - something that is already stressed to the limit today.

 

* After all the Dutch did this centuries ago - but they didn't have to deal with limestone "bedrock".

 

Edited by Ozexpatriate
  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozexpatriate said:

We have plenty of alternative and catastrophic ways of doing that very quickly.

 

I hope I'm wrong but I suspect the consequences of warming could be quite rapid. Complex systems tend to have a "tipping point".

  • Like 8
  • Agree 4
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning All,

 

It is a fairly mild morning in this part of the world.  Certainly an improvement over yesterday's biting cold.

 

I could get into the climate change debate, but I am not going to! 

 

Time for a coffee - Have a good day everyone...

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AndyID said:

I hope I'm wrong but I suspect the consequences of warming could be quite rapid. Complex systems tend to have a "tipping point".

I hope so too. It's my understanding that the IPCC had a 2°C target over pre-industrial levels, which now seems to be reframed into a 1.5°C target, which some sources suggest that if nothing else changes, we will exceed in 2040 ± 10 years. We are certainly running out of time to change the outcome, but a particular challenge in terms of generating action is that the dire consequences are in "the future" however long or short that might be.  2030 is only ten years away.

 

It's hard to imagine (let alone know) what the state of the democracies of the English speaking world will look like by this time next year.

 

Edited by Ozexpatriate
  • Like 2
  • Agree 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...