Paul_C Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Hi All, I am looking to change the buffers on my rake of Triang Hornby R668 models. Any suggestions please as to which ones would be the closest option (or better still an exact match). The best reference point is Paul Bartlett's collection where you can find some good shots of them in STS livery. I haven't attached any as I'm still awaiting Paul's permission before I post them openly on this thread. Paul. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flood Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) Diagram TT039B states buffer length of 520mm, head diameter of 406mm. That's 1 ft 8.5 in long and 16 in heads. The photos show them to be oleo buffers so in 4mm I would use Lanarkshire Models BP03 (these are not sprung). Even though the diagram image looks nothing like the actual wagon all the build details, registration nos. etc. match up. Edited March 13 by Flood Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_C Posted March 13 Author Share Posted March 13 Hi, Thanks for replying to my post. Where is the diagram TT039B that you refer to? Can I get access to it by any chance? Paul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BR traction instructor Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 (edited) The Barrowmore Model Railway Group site will have it in their drawings section. I have seen a rake of these transformed with scratchbuilt underframes, etched ladders/walkways etc, the transition from 1970s RTR to an accurate model was impressive but obviously time consuming. BeRTIe Edited March 14 by BR traction instructor 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_C Posted March 14 Author Share Posted March 14 These are the slurry tanks that I refer to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium John Isherwood Posted March 14 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 14 7 minutes ago, Paul_C said: These are the slurry tanks that I refer to. The diagram TT039B is the correct one - but it does not have the correct drawing! CJI. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmrspaul Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 3 hours ago, cctransuk said: The diagram TT039B is the correct one - but it does not have the correct drawing! CJI. Ah the joys of modelling the BR period. Although the officials don't often get it quite as wrong as that! It looks like they woke up to the mistake. In http://www.barrowmoremrg.co.uk/BRBDocuments/Book300Part3Dugdale01_Issue.pdf there is TT071A for the IIRC unique 53129 and they don't have running numbers on TT071B but looks like it is for most of these wagons. Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_C Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 These are the Accurascale ones suggested to me. I can't check out how they look against the Lanarkshire Models version as for some reason I am blocked from entering their website. I've put their name into the browser but when I search it comes up as Error 404 and blocks my inquiry. Paul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flood Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 The Accurascale ones are sprung (which may well be your preference) and pack OP12 which you have shown look to be 1'8.5" in length (as stated for your wagons). For your information, pack OP2 look to be the same diameter head but 2'1/2" in length. I don't know whether these links will work for you: http://www.lanarkshiremodels.com/lanarkshiremodelsandsupplieswebsite_159.htm http://www.lanarkshiremodels.com/lanarkshiremodelsandsupplieswebsite159001.jpg 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_C Posted March 16 Author Share Posted March 16 Hi Flood, Thank you kindly for the reply. I've managed to click onto your second link which shows a photo of a buffer that looks to be brass. That looks spot on I must say. Are these BP03? Paul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium John Isherwood Posted March 16 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 16 34 minutes ago, Paul_C said: Hi Flood, Thank you kindly for the reply. I've managed to click onto your second link which shows a photo of a buffer that looks to be brass. That looks spot on I must say. Are these BP03? Paul. I think that the brass appearance is just the lighting - I'm pretty sure that the product is cast whitemetal. CJI. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BR traction instructor Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Here is a screenshot of buffer BP03. BeRTIe Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_C Posted March 16 Author Share Posted March 16 Thank you for that Bertie, this one is definitely the answer. Paul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_C Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 I have bought eighteen packs of BP03 and four packs of BP08, the latter will go on the two 1971 additions. I now have to delve into the minefield of couplings as it would be nice if I can use a three link system for another piece of reality. Paul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Fatadder Posted March 28 RMweb Gold Share Posted March 28 The other option for improving the buffers on these (along with improving the rest of the underframe) is to mount the old Triang tanks onto a Bachmann TTA chassis. It is many years since I did the conversion (and ive since sold them on), but from memory once you cut off the Triang fixing clips it was pretty much a direct fit glued onto the Bachmann chassis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul_C Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 Have you got any photos of them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now