Jump to content
 

Peterborough North


great northern
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
On 10/08/2024 at 09:06, great northern said:

60867 is not stopping here, so we follow it past the spotters, who have seen it many times before....

48674.JPG.f9ab0e6db35275c14756e1dc17184d70.JPG

and on towards Spital bridge and places further north.

58675.JPG.3cb3cdd6b61f1a06dc598a8e70d67dfc.JPG

Good afternoon Gilbert,

 

As you know, I look at your (very-interesting) thread a couple of times a week, though I rarely comment. However, the shot of a V2 on a train to Hull, with a Bradford portion at the front intrigues me. 

 

I know you have more of BR's C&W notices than I have access to, but I cannot find a train to Hull with a Bradford portion (you state it's the 1.28 pm - I must try to find that). Most Bradford portions seemed to be in Leeds trains, at the rear in both directions. 

 

The following shots of GANNET on a Ripon train also show a Mk.1 BCK with Bradford branding (is it the same carriage? The white board borders appear to be the same - there should be no white border to the boards; easily removed with a black felt-tip). Surely a train from Ripon (which, I assume would reverse at Leeds Central), if it had a Bradford portion, would pick these up at Wakefield, attached to the rear? Or were they attached (to the front) at Leeds? 

 

My sets with a Bradford portion, all have them at the rear, Up and Down. If I'm wrong in this interpretation, I'll have to do some rearranging.

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
3 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

Good afternoon Gilbert,

 

As you know, I look at your (very-interesting) thread a couple of times a week, though I rarely comment. However, the shot of a V2 on a train to Hull, with a Bradford portion at the front intrigues me. 

 

I know you have more of BR's C&W notices than I have access to, but I cannot find a train to Hull with a Bradford portion (you state it's the 1.28 pm - I must try to find that). Most Bradford portions seemed to be in Leeds trains, at the rear in both directions. 

 

The following shots of GANNET on a Ripon train also show a Mk.1 BCK with Bradford branding (is it the same carriage? The white board borders appear to be the same - there should be no white border to the boards; easily removed with a black felt-tip). Surely a train from Ripon (which, I assume would reverse at Leeds Central), if it had a Bradford portion, would pick these up at Wakefield, attached to the rear? Or were they attached (to the front) at Leeds? 

 

My sets with a Bradford portion, all have them at the rear, Up and Down. If I'm wrong in this interpretation, I'll have to do some rearranging.

 

Regards,

 

Tony. 

Nothing you need to do Tony. Remember this is me you are dealing with. Notably unobservant, and often idle. The simple answer is that I misread the instructions on the screen, and used the wrong cassette. Then, of course, I either didn't notice, or couldn't be bothered to change it. The former is more likely, I usually only notice such things after the photograph has been taken. Then, of course, when it came to the next train to be made up, the Ripon, I was just pleased that I could use the same cassette again. You may mark me down severely.

  • Funny 1
  • Friendly/supportive 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I have just discovered that Windoze has unilaterally decided to amalgamate folders of pictures taken on 11th and 13th, and not only that, arranged it so that the later one comes first. As a result, I have shopped all the pictures for the 13th, but now find I haven't done all of 11th. We are not amused. Where's the absolutely fuming emoji gone?

  • Friendly/supportive 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, great northern said:

Only a few yards to go now, with eleven on it will not be far off the platform end when it stops.

 

But will it make it Gilbert? Or more likely, be able to pull away again after the stop? A comment on the prototype, not your model.

 

Kind regards,

 

30368

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, 30368 said:

 

But will it make it Gilbert? Or more likely, be able to pull away again after the stop? A comment on the prototype, not your model.

 

Kind regards,

 

30368

From what I saw and have read, the problem was not that they were unreliable, it was that they turned out to be no better than a Pacific in good nick. Not their fault at all, false expectations had been built up, and the Eastern had already realised that, so the Deltics were soon to be on their way.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, great northern said:

From what I saw and have read, the problem was not that they were unreliable, it was that they turned out to be no better than a Pacific in good nick. Not their fault at all, false expectations had been built up, and the Eastern had already realised that, so the Deltics were soon to be on their way.

From personal experience I would say that they were relatively unreliable and wouldn't knock the skin off a rice pudding. I remember as a youngster going to Euston from Crewe a couple of times in the 60s, the second time was electric to Stafford and type 4 D200 sort the rest of the way (I have seen paint dry faster). The previous year was a Princess, I know which I preferred, though of course, electric all the  way would have been a different matter.

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

For some reason, I was not allowed to enter the second image, let alone add any text. So, I posted the first one, as I thought, intending to do a second post. Then I found that the second image had been added, but I still couldn't add any more text. I haven't a clue why that happened.

 

Anyway, the arrival of 61073, the roughest of our B1s, soon changed all that. This is an arrival from Grimsby, a slow stopper, which is all this loco is capable of handling. The sequence told me this was 34E duty 27, and that seemed OK, even though this is my oldest B1, and not a great runner. However, when I scrolled down further, I was reminded that this train ran Q, as required. The B1 had not behaved well on the short run from the fiddle yard, and so was deemed totally unsuitable to go any further. Of course, I could not resist an executive decision that the train was to carry on to KX. The alarm and consternation caused will be developed further tomorrow. Nothing like a good cliff hanger, is there?  And don't say this is nothing like one.

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
Posted (edited)

As a member of the "national society against cruelty to Type 4s", some of the above comments about their haulage capacity is a wee bit unfair. I would like to remind those negative thinkers that the Type 4s along with their cousins the Type 3s and Type 1s recorded the highest availabilities each year they were is service. They might not be super fast but they will not expire on route and they will get you to your destination.

a005.jpg.0b52376d74e7b28aa70d7bba2c2e0929.jpg

Chassis made up from Bachmann spare bogies and motor for an extended Tri-ang class 37.

 

001a.jpg.2dc4ae09b6738b01f1d2c590142e8147.jpg

This one is sat on a borrowed lengthened Peak chassis.

 

 

 

Edited by Clive Mortimore
  • Like 12
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
  • Round of applause 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, Clive Mortimore said:

As a member of the "national society against cruelty to Type 4s", some of the above comments about their haulage capacity is a wee bit unfair. I would like to remind those negative thinkers that the Type 4s along with their cousins the Type 3s and Type 1s recorded the highest availabilities each year they were is service. They might not be super fast but they will not expire on route and they will get you to your destination.

a005.jpg.0b52376d74e7b28aa70d7bba2c2e0929.jpg

Chassis made up from Bachmann spare bogies and motor for an extended Tri-ang class 37.

 

001a.jpg.2dc4ae09b6738b01f1d2c590142e8147.jpg

This one is sat on a borrowed lengthened Peak chassis.

 

 

 

It wasn't their haulage capacity Clive, it was how slowly they did it. And that Peak has got the wrong number. Even I know that.

  • Round of applause 2
  • Funny 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
Posted (edited)

Can the A3 get from NE to PN to take its place on the train with the Deltic on the up? 

 

Edit - And the J3 blocking the Up Slow?

Edited by Oldddudders
  • Agree 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
5 hours ago, Oldddudders said:

Can the A3 get from NE to PN to take its place on the train with the Deltic on the up? 

 

Edit - And the J3 blocking the Up Slow?

It can I think, but with some difficulty, although it depends on what it was doing when the call to action came, and how much notice was given. Assuming the call was made at Boston, that would allow about an hour to get 60090 ready. Is that possible if it was in light steam at the time? If so, the only way I can see, given that the Up slow is out of action owing to a defective turnout, would be out onto the Up main from shed, along to the crossovers between ECML and Midland, reverse across onto the Midland, and forward down to the far end of the chord from East. From there, it would be possible to reverse up to Crescent Junction, and thence to continue to reverse to the station, and on to the train. How long would that take? Depends on other traffic, I suppose, but not more than about 15 minutes, I think.

  • Like 7
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...