Jump to content
 

Interesting and inspiring photos from Flickr....


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, montyburns56 said:

RTC Test Train  Relly Mill Viaduct 1984 by Bill Watson

 

TEST TRAIN AT RELLY MILL VIADUCT

 

Heaton South Junction

 

SOMETHING ALWAYS GOT IN THE WAY! # 3

 

Otherwise known as the 'Tribometer Train' and consisted of

Lab 11 RDB975046, COV-AB RDB999900 and 'Auto-trailer' RDB975076 - usually hauled by R&D dept's own loco.

http://www.traintesting.com/tribometer_train.htm

'Waverley West' on RMweb has modelled this.

Edited by keefer
  • Informative/Useful 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 03/12/2022 at 06:15, 03060 said:

Don't think that we've had this one before .... taken by MagLad.

 

Class 122  Monks Sidings 24/02/84

 

So much to take in ... chaps coming out of the weighbridge office on the left ... mascot on the shunter ... facing point leading straight into the works shed ... driver training Unit ... 4 very different house surfaces on the same building, etc, etc.

 

Here is the location after the steel works closed, I've set it to just where the train has passed under the WCML and is heading out through Warrington Low Level

 

  • Like 3
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
20 hours ago, KeithMacdonald said:

Thanks to David Rostance

 

 

Is the turntable still there?

 

D400/50030, Yeovil Junction. October 1991

 


It certainly is.  Clan Line was turned there on the “End of Southern Steam” excursion last year.

 

Cheers

 

Darius

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw 9516 at Didcot in 2017 and was surprised what a well proportioned machine it was. Such a shame BR wrote the 14's so quickly, at least they found success in private hands. BR's short sightedness with the hydraulics again, not to mention some of the steam classes!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
16 minutes ago, Blackthorn said:

I saw 9516 at Didcot in 2017 and was surprised what a well proportioned machine it was. Such a shame BR wrote the 14's so quickly, at least they found success in private hands. BR's short sightedness with the hydraulics again, not to mention some of the steam classes!!!!!

 

I thought the issue was that the work they were designed for disappeared even as they were being delivered rather than just a hydraulic clearout? Why else try them off the WR in the Hull area?

 

Regards,

Simon

 

 

  • Agree 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 65179 said:

 

I thought the issue was that the work they were designed for disappeared even as they were being delivered rather than just a hydraulic clearout? Why else try them off the WR in the Hull area?

 

Regards,

Simon

 

 

True, but why bother to introduce them at all then? The panniers  et al . should had have worked to the end and retired gracecfully. Don't get me wrong, without Dr. Beeching the UK wouldn't have the best railway preservation communities in the world, his cuts would not have led to the preservation movement of the '60's, '70''s and even today. This side of the pond any kind of working heritage railway is a rarity. I have visited the Canadian Railway Museum in Montreal, the museum, in Toronto, at the former roundhouses where Flying Scotsman, and I think the Royal Scot were housed on parts of their Canadian tours and the museum in Squamish, British Columbia.  All worth visiting just don't expect the British heritage line. They're basically static displays.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can’t look at Class 14 in isolation; if you step back and look at BR in the round from c1955 to c1965 you will see that it was caught in a huge “paradigm shift” in transport and logistics as road motor vehicles “came of age” and the road network began to be seriously useful for long-distance purposes.

 

BR made multiple decisions that imply that they didn’t appreciate, or did appreciate, but simply couldn’t keep up with, the pace of change. A bit like high street retailers trying to adjust to the realities of internet trading over the past c5 years. It’s something of a miracle, and to some degree to the credit of Dr Beeching, that BR came out of the other side of the maelstrom with any meaningful network left.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The reason the cl.14s (and the other type 1 locos) existed was the BTC/British Railways imagined the same old traffic/network carrying on, with diesel replacing steam to provide the major cost savings.

As Nearholmer says, this business model was already pretty obsolete, so a lot of the most inefficient services/flows/practices were the first to go.

This included the relatively small/short-distance 'trip' workings the Type 1s were built for.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I may be massively wrong here but here's a theory on why the railways went so quickly in the 1950/60s.

 

Politicians are generally quite well off and will invest their money, especially those of a blue colour.

 

The railways were a nationalised concern, so no benefit to investing in railways as no return on shares bought as you cannot buy any.  However, despite there being a national carrier, there was an opportunity to invest heavily in road transport companies.  So no incentive for the wealthy to invest in railways, losts of incentive to invest in road schemes and haulage companies.  And when you have that incentive, you are disincentivised from focusing on making the railways work, in fact you'd prefer the very opposite.

 

So you have the railways trying to be more efficient whilst those in actual charge really wanting something very different and actively promoting schemes that will only make it harder for the railways to ever achieve efficiency and be losing custom all the time.

  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

More specific than that, Beeching was in charge of 'reshaping' the railways while his brother-in-law Ernest Marples was head of the biggest road-building company in Britain. Conflict of interest much?

Also various other conditions applied to the railways that did not apply to the roads/hauliers e.g. common carrier status.

A big factor which meant the railways were always going to be on the defensive was the 1955 strike, which drove a lot of traffic straight to road haulage.

From then on, BR was having to justify every penny spent on it (unlike the roads).

  • Like 2
  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
15 hours ago, montyburns56 said:

Bradford Interchange/Exchange 1974 by John Whiteley

 

Old and new at Bradford.

 

 

I have slightly vague memories of walking through the station around this period, aged 6 or so with my Grandma who would treat me to a toasted currant teacake in a cafe in town. Happy Days.

 

Thanks for the reminder,

Ian.

Edited by 03060
Correction, Arndale Centre not built until 1976 !
  • Like 3
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Acton Lane steam, Dec 23rd 1977. I was 8, living in Ayrshire,  and 4 months later moved to the southern WCML, 30 min by train from here.

Acton Lane

 

This absolutely reeks of 1970's neglect & run-down.

 

Edited by rodent279
  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...