Jump to content
 

Chuffnell Regis


Graham T
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, Harlequin said:

Coopercraft have become a famous basket case in recent years. Don't have any financial dealings with them unless you can get the product in your hands in person when handing over money. Secondhand on eBay might be more trustworthy but either way I gather that the tooling they used became very old and worn so kits might not be high quality - lots of scarf and mis-registration.

 

 

A shame, as the kits are (were) very nice.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 hours ago, longchap said:

How are you securing the railway on the other side of the station building? Will cars be parked in part of this area, as evidenced by the MG?

 

Yes, I posted up a plan for the fencing a few pages back.  The track will all be protected!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 hours ago, Graham T said:

Yes, I posted up a plan for the fencing a few pages back.  The track will all be protected!

 

Sorry Graham, I hadn't spotted that. That's the problem with you young chaps, leave you alone for a few days and you've filled several more pages with posts!

 

Good progress, keep it coming.

 

Bill

  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
38 minutes ago, MrWolf said:

Best hunted down on eBay if you can't get to swap meets or exhibitions.

 

Some of.my Cooper Craft items (in fact most of the wagons) date back to the 1980s when I was at school.

 

Well in fact Cooper Crafts have been attracting very high prices by eBay sellers, but I've collected many from Hattons' previously loved sales at sensible prices in the past, seldom seen nowadays however, but the original kits are superbly well made and are a joy to build.

 

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

There's people who have been asking very high prices, but the kits have been on eBay quite a while.

High prices are attracted by the right kind of wagons in auction lots, particularly cattle wagons, because there's no modern equivalent, even so they average out at £12-15 apiece. Provender wagons and loco coal wagons turn up regularly and don't fetch a lot.

Possibly the rarest kit is the platelayers tool set with jacks, rail saws and rail bending crow. The platform trollies aren't all that common, but the tools and barrows or platform seats turn up fairly regularly.

The old kits were great and are what got me into "proper" railway modelling rather than just running a train set.

So whoever it was that had the original moulds made, thank you for a lifetime hobby.

 

1926943848_925154_3c2b3bb17bd646338137b497fd24b463mv2_d_3024_4032_s_4_2.jpg.5f7d9a1a585f592abccd559c57ad79ae.jpg

 

JWmodelrailways

Edited by MrWolf
Picture
  • Like 6
  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If somebody was willing to loan some well built coopercraft platform stuff it would not be that hard to scan them and 3D print some fresh ones, ready assembled. Better would be getting ModelU to scan the real thing and print.

Edited by Andy Keane
  • Agree 4
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
10 hours ago, Neal Ball said:

As Phil said earlier @Harlequin avoid Cooper Craft these days. I doubt we will see their products again

 

I've made some tentative efforts with the current Cooper Craft, and got nowhere unfortunately.

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
9 hours ago, MrWolf said:

There's people who have been asking very high prices, but the kits have been on eBay quite a while.

High prices are attracted by the right kind of wagons in auction lots, particularly cattle wagons, because there's no modern equivalent, even so they average out at £12-15 apiece. Provender wagons and loco coal wagons turn up regularly and don't fetch a lot.

Possibly the rarest kit is the platelayers tool set with jacks, rail saws and rail bending crow. The platform trollies aren't all that common, but the tools and barrows or platform seats turn up fairly regularly.

The old kits were great and are what got me into "proper" railway modelling rather than just running a train set.

So whoever it was that had the original moulds made, thank you for a lifetime hobby.

 

1926943848_925154_3c2b3bb17bd646338137b497fd24b463mv2_d_3024_4032_s_4_2.jpg.5f7d9a1a585f592abccd559c57ad79ae.jpg

 

JWmodelrailways

 

I've used JWM from time to time, they have some interesting pieces in stock usually.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, Andy Keane said:

If somebody was willing to loan some well built coopercraft platform stuff it would not be that hard to scan them and 3D print some fresh ones, ready assembled. Better would be getting ModelU to scan the real thing and print.

 

Wouldn't there potentially be copyright issues with scanning the Cooper Craft items though?

  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Here's how things would look using just the Ratio fencing.  Of course, the pack only has one of the gates that I need, so I'll have to order another one.

 

There will also be some post and rail fencing continuing across the end of the buffers towards the goods yard, to protect the tracks from rogue road traffic!

 

IMG20220827111828.jpg.60a282fb9cc7c70f443b7053ddf70cdc.jpg

 

And of course post and wire fencing here to separate the road.

 

IMG20220827111954.jpg.2dce52511d1da88b7b49a28155ee6636.jpg

  • Like 10
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Graham T said:

Here's how things would look using just the Ratio fencing.  Of course, the pack only has one of the gates that I need, so I'll have to order another one.

 

There will also be some post and rail fencing continuing across the end of the buffers towards the goods yard, to protect the tracks from rogue road traffic!

 

IMG20220827111828.jpg.60a282fb9cc7c70f443b7053ddf70cdc.jpg

 

And of course post and wire fencing here to separate the road.

 

IMG20220827111954.jpg.2dce52511d1da88b7b49a28155ee6636.jpg

That's exactly what I had in mind, except perhaps I would truncate the picket fence at the gate post for the end loading bay (or rather shorten it at the station end and move it up to the gate post).

Andy

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
19 minutes ago, Andy Keane said:

That's exactly what I had in mind, except perhaps I would truncate the picket fence at the gate post for the end loading bay (or rather shorten it at the station end and move it up to the gate post).

Andy

 

Yes, I was planning to do just that.  I won't cut any of the fence until I figure out the size of the station building though.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, Graham T said:

Here's how things would look using just the Ratio fencing.  Of course, the pack only has one of the gates that I need, so I'll have to order another one.

 

There will also be some post and rail fencing continuing across the end of the buffers towards the goods yard, to protect the tracks from rogue road traffic!

 

IMG20220827111828.jpg.60a282fb9cc7c70f443b7053ddf70cdc.jpg

 

And of course post and wire fencing here to separate the road.

 

IMG20220827111954.jpg.2dce52511d1da88b7b49a28155ee6636.jpg

 

That fence / gates combination looks so much better.

 

Apologies I didnt reply earlier, I was working through my decoder issues and whilst I had photographed some gates for you.... I didnt have the iPad with me to PM a message for you. But those Ratio gates and fence are exactly right for that scenario.

 

One photo might still be of use though. This is the book I have referred to:

 

IMG_2260.jpeg.4f0565477808e1fda76fdecc2f02a969.jpeg

 

If you can get hold of a copy it would be worth while. Plus of course the Stephen Williams 3 books on GWR branch line modelling.

 

Have a good afternoon.

  • Like 3
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Graham T said:

Of course, the pack only has one of the gates that I need, so I'll have to order another one.

Graham - I've hit the same problem in the past, so I made a gate out of one of the straight fencing pieces.  Our local station (ex GWR) had gates like this.  I cut the straight fencing piece to the required length, added dummy hinges out of micro strip, and added some gate posts.  It was a cheaper option than buying a whole pack of fencing just because I wanted the gate.

 

Just looked on the web and Watlington station had gates like this.  I forgot to mention I also added appropriate cross bracing out of micro strip

Edited by Gopher
  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, Neal Ball said:

 

That fence / gates combination looks so much better.

 

Apologies I didnt reply earlier, I was working through my decoder issues and whilst I had photographed some gates for you.... I didnt have the iPad with me to PM a message for you. But those Ratio gates and fence are exactly right for that scenario.

 

One photo might still be of use though. This is the book I have referred to:

 

IMG_2260.jpeg.4f0565477808e1fda76fdecc2f02a969.jpeg

 

If you can get hold of a copy it would be worth while. Plus of course the Stephen Williams 3 books on GWR branch line modelling.

 

Have a good afternoon.

 

Thanks Neal.  I have the Stephen Williams books so will have a trawl through those.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 19/08/2022 at 19:37, Andy Keane said:

It would be interesting to know how the GWR dealt with station approach roads. I don’t even know who was responsible for such roads, the railway or the town.

 

I'm about 5 pages behind and catching up this morning and maybe someone has already  answered your question @Andy Keane.

 

Whilst I can't answer specifically for the GWR, I can from my general knowledge of being involved in new works on BR that required a railway Act. I would suspect the general principles were unchanged.

 

If the railway had not designed its station to be adjacent to an existing road, the station approach road would become part of the 'permanent works' necessary for the construction of the railway. Hence it would need to be identified as part of the land to be acquired through compulsory purchase following Royal Assent to the Act authorising the railway. I would therefore expect the station approach road to belong to the railway company from its junction with an existing road.

 

As a consultee, the local authority may have been able to have particular conditions accepted by the railway company to remove opposition to the act. That may have included construction details such as the type of surfacing and possibly how any surface drainage was to be dealt with. So although the station approach road may look of similar construction to the local road, it may have been built by the railway to standards agreed as part of the Act. 

 

Similar conditions could be imposed by any consultee affected by the acquistion of land. Hence local land owners could (and did) get various concessions from the railway, such as the architectural style of the local station, or lowering a railway so it didn't spoil the local Lords view. 

 

I think this Ian Allan book is out of print now and it is many years since I read it, but has many fascinating details of these sort of negotiations. I've pulled it off my bookshelf and had a quick dip to confirm my recollections are accurate:     https://www.amazon.co.uk/Railway-Surveyors-Story-Property-Management/dp/0711019541

 

Hope this is of interest.

  • Informative/Useful 9
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fishplate said:

Hence local land owners could (and did) get various concessions from the railway

As part of building Eggesford station in Devon, there was a requirement from the local lord whose land the line went through that every train passing the station also stopped at it, as that would be more convenient for him.

More than 150 years later, the relevant charter is still in force, much to GWR's annoyance, I imagine.

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Lord Chuffnell tried to have a similar condition imposed when the plans were taking shape for the Chuffnell Regis branch, then his trusty valet pointed out that the station was going to be a terminus...

  • Like 1
  • Round of applause 1
  • Funny 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Graham T said:

Lord Chuffnell tried to have a similar condition imposed when the plans were taking shape for the Chuffnell Regis branch, then his trusty valet pointed out that the station was going to be a terminus...

 

That sounds like a Geeves and Wooster moment...

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...