RMweb Gold Not Jeremy Posted April 9, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 9, 2021 17 hours ago, Edwardian said: If manufacturers do not move beyond what happens to have survived in preservation, the hobby will never progress. How so? I think you are confusing two things here. Retail gratification, which is manifestly attractive to many, is at best creatively neutral, whereas our Hobby is a wonderful and creative activity that operates on multiple levels and is available to anyone with curiosity and interest. No price tags attached either.... 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Edwardian Posted April 9, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 9, 2021 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Not Jeremy said: How so? I think you are confusing two things here. Retail gratification, which is manifestly attractive to many, is at best creatively neutral, whereas our Hobby is a wonderful and creative activity that operates on multiple levels and is available to anyone with curiosity and interest. No price tags attached either.... Probably an unnecessary post, which does not seem to me to advance matters, but I will do you the courtesy of responding to it anyway. I do not apprehend the slightest risk of confusion on my part. I meant what I said. The context is RTR, so my comment should be understood as applying to that sector. For modellers to be encouraged to explore other periods, easing them in with RTR can be important. Sensible choices of subject aid that, rather than the current practice of manufacturers to produce apparently random stuff, some of which is useful, some less so. Aerolite might be an attractive choice for a collector, but can hardly be a priority for anyone with an interest in the NER but who may lack the time, resources, tools and skills from fashioning it all out of brass sheet. More useful choices help to progress the hobby. I thought that, in context, I had made that point clearly enough without the need to repeat and elaborate. Obviously I was mistaken in that. Edited April 9, 2021 by Edwardian spelling! 3 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Not Jeremy Posted April 9, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 9, 2021 Quote Probably an unnecessary post, which does not seem to me to advance matters, but I will do you the courtesy of responding to it anyway. You are too kind!! 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold tomparryharry Posted April 16, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 16, 2021 On 08/04/2021 at 10:24, Edwardian said: Just going to leave these here ... Oooh, dark room, gotta lie down now.... 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Edwardian Posted April 16, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 16, 2021 The fairest of them all .... 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold tomparryharry Posted April 16, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 16, 2021 A colleague is currently collecting parts which were common to the locomotive, but in 1:1 scale. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltic Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Oh, so many EMUs to consider. GFor me it would be the Clacton Units on the GE Mainline as a starting point. But then they could consider the Class 32X series giving rise to OHL and Third Rail operation, not to mention a multitude of liveries. Could be in N and 00. Well we can but hope. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les1952 Posted May 11, 2021 Share Posted May 11, 2021 Lets face it, with the reputation Rapido are building up whatever they make (just about) will sell. Just a thought Les 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted May 12, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 12, 2021 On 16/04/2021 at 12:12, Edwardian said: The fairest of them all .... A former neighbour of mine was very fond of her as she was his regular engine for some while when he was a Fireman. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold tomparryharry Posted May 12, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 12, 2021 2 hours ago, The Stationmaster said: A former neighbour of mine was very fond of her as she was his regular engine for some while when he was a Fireman. Yes. Apparently there are a lot of common parts to the 48xx locomotives, and (so I'm told ) the 54-64xx motion parts. If the Clean Air Act doesn't trample all over it, then we are advancing ever closer to replica locomotives of extinct types becoming an everyday occurrence. Saint, 47xx, Grange, a working Dean Goods, The list is longer than my wallet.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold ruggedpeak Posted May 12, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 12, 2021 20 hours ago, Deltic said: Oh, so many EMUs to consider. GFor me it would be the Clacton Units on the GE Mainline as a starting point. But then they could consider the Class 32X series giving rise to OHL and Third Rail operation, not to mention a multitude of liveries. Could be in N and 00. Well we can but hope. Revolution are doing 320 and 321 in N, is that not Rapido? Really need them in OO too. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdvle Posted May 12, 2021 Share Posted May 12, 2021 26 minutes ago, ruggedpeak said: Revolution are doing 320 and 321 in N, is that not Rapido? Really need them in OO too. No, Revolution is using Sonic to do the 320/321 models - mentioned on the webpage https://www.revolutiontrains.com/class-320-and-class-321/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Legend Posted May 12, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 12, 2021 2 hours ago, mdvle said: No, Revolution is using Sonic to do the 320/321 models - mentioned on the webpage https://www.revolutiontrains.com/class-320-and-class-321/ Still would be nice in OO 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold ruggedpeak Posted May 12, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 12, 2021 18 minutes ago, Legend said: Still would be nice in OO Spent years travelling in 321s up and down the GEML and would definitely buy one to recreate the experience! Loads of livery options, still in use including potentially fast parcel services, and growing interest in electrics. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MG 7305 Posted May 23, 2021 Share Posted May 23, 2021 An easy fix would be to make a 15xx smokebox door available without the number plate so GWR modellers could cheat a bit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathan70000 Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 (edited) Made two suggestions- the D49 and the C12. The D49 is the LNER's equivalent to the GWR Manor- widespread, numerous and very well proportioned. Rapido might well shy away from it for fear of provoking Hornby to upgrade their Railroad model but it's definitely time a new one was available... As for the C12, well, it was more widespread and therefore more useful to the modeller than the J70 which seems to have been a success. Edited June 1, 2021 by nathan70000 2 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Legend Posted June 1, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 1, 2021 2 minutes ago, nathan70000 said: Made two suggestions- the D49 and the C12. The D49 is the LNER's equivalent to the GWR Manor- widespread, numerous and very well proportioned. Rapido might well shy away from it for fear of provoking Hornby to upgrade their Railroad model but it's definitely time a new one was available... As for the C12, well, it was more widespread and therefore more useful to the modeller than the J70 which seems to have been a success. D49 is a Hornby model . Simon Kohler will have had the revised version under development for about 2 months prior to Rapido starting it . He will still be smarting as they pinched the Titfield Thunderbolt rights from under his nose . 3 1 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GNR Dave Posted June 3, 2021 Share Posted June 3, 2021 Good call on the C12. For my money the most hansom of tank engines. I'd also throw the J6 in the mix (no Great Northern bias what so ever ) as a long lived freight engine. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Edwardian Posted June 3, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 3, 2021 Provided we can have pre-Grouping/as built versions, of these suggested GNR locos, I'm all for it. I think that the GER T26, including their later careers, including more northerly postings, as LNER/BR E4s, would be an exceptionally popular choice. But we really do need one in GER ultramarine blue. Iresistable! 2 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Nile Posted June 3, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 3, 2021 Both locos in that photo please. 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Edwardian Posted June 3, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 3, 2021 8 minutes ago, Nile said: Both locos in that photo please. Frankly, I'd subscribe to a Rapido season ticket for Bressingham, 'cos while they are there measuring up the T26/E4 and the LT&S tank, they could take in the Buck Jumper and the Klondyke. Link Ssssh, don't tell Mr Copy-Cat of Margate!!! 2 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold A Murphy Posted June 3, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 3, 2021 (edited) T26/E4 and Buckjumper, yes please. And what about a Saint for the green team? I would have to buy one under rule 1. Edited June 3, 2021 by A Murphy 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted June 3, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 3, 2021 59 minutes ago, Edwardian said: Frankly, I'd subscribe to a Rapido season ticket for Bressingham, 'cos while they are there measuring up the T26/E4 and the LT&S tank, they could take in the Buck Jumper and the Klondyke. Link Ssssh, don't tell Mr Copy-Cat of Margate!!! Do I get the impression that you have something of a bias towards railways on the eastern side of London but south of The Wash ? Oh and just to upset the rest of your day I saw a certain ex GER 2-4-0 while it was still in traffic in BR days and, gravitating northwards, I had a number of D49s underlined in my ABC as they were very much North Eastern area (and Scottish) engines. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Downer Posted June 3, 2021 RMweb Premium Share Posted June 3, 2021 An ex-LMS 2-6-2T please. Fowler or Stanier, I’m not fussy. Both would be better. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Ian Hargrave Posted June 3, 2021 RMweb Gold Share Posted June 3, 2021 9 minutes ago, The Stationmaster said: Do I get the impression that you have something of a bias towards railways on the eastern side of London but south of The Wash ? Oh and just to upset the rest of your day I saw a certain ex GER 2-4-0 while it was still in traffic in BR days and, gravitating northwards, I had a number of D49s underlined in my ABC as they were very much North Eastern area (and Scottish) engines. But really,the gap in the current NE catalogue is surely the B16 ? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now