Jump to content
 

Accurascale's First Steam Locomotive; GWR Collett 78xx Manor Class!


Recommended Posts

  • Accurascale staff
10 minutes ago, Harlequin said:

@Accurascale Fran

On future steam locos please make allowance for the biggest possible speaker(s) you can practically fit so that the sound is up to the standard of your diesel locos.

Thanks.

 

 

Hi Phil,

 

Noted of course. Believe me, we tried to get an Accurathrash speaker to fit in the manor tender, but it was no dice. Again, something we can't physically do with the buckjumper either, but we do take the advice on board and will look to see what we can do to unlock the quality of the sound file.

 

Cheers!

 

Fran 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Round of applause 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my Erlestoke arrived today, and to be frank I'm horrified. The detail is lovely - far better than anything else I've ever seen, but the performance is dire. Slowing right down to a crawl on 3rd radius curves - at 40% speed, no crawling capapbility whatsoever - anyone else had this issue?


Edit - should probably add that i'm already in touch about Torquay, but will also mention Erlestoke!

Edited by TimberValleyRailway
More info
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
4 minutes ago, TimberValleyRailway said:

Well my Erlestoke arrived today, and to be frank I'm horrified. The detail is lovely - far better than anything else I've ever seen, but the performance is dire. Slowing right down to a crawl on 3rd radius curves - at 40% speed, no crawling capapbility whatsoever - anyone else had this issue?


Edit - should probably add that i'm already in touch about Torquay, but will also mention Erlestoke!

yep i've got this, b2b looks fine, can't see anything obvious binding, stay alive is also not working at all. spoke to my retailer and returning today for a replacement. fingers crossed the replacement is good or i shall be having a refund.

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

yep i've got this, b2b looks fine, can't see anything obvious binding, stay alive is also not working at all. spoke to my retailer and returning today for a replacement. fingers crossed the replacement is good or i shall be having a refund.

Glad it's not just me, i'll test it at my model club tonight to see if the issue persists.

 

Any other analogue users on here, what's your experience been like?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Accurascale staff
Just now, TimberValleyRailway said:

Glad it's not just me, i'll test it at my model club tonight to see if the issue persists.

 

Any other analogue users on here, what's your experience been like?

 

Obviously the stay alive will not work on Analogue, and we'd always recommend a good run-in, but if you are having any issues that are not immediately obvious, do talk to your retailer, or us if you bought direct and we'd be delighted to help.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
24 minutes ago, McC said:

 

Obviously the stay alive will not work on Analogue, and we'd always recommend a good run-in, but if you are having any issues that are not immediately obvious, do talk to your retailer, or us if you bought direct and we'd be delighted to help.

Very happy with mine on DCC so no complaints from me but if the DCC ready ones have the capacitors fitted could it be they are sucking up current and therefore causing a voltage drop which is why @TimberValleyRailways example slowing? Cure therefore being either remove capacitor or upgrade power supply to layout?

  • Thanks 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
51 minutes ago, Accurascale Fran said:

 

Hi Phil,

 

Noted of course. Believe me, we tried to get an Accurathrash speaker to fit in the manor tender, but it was no dice. Again, something we can't physically do with the buckjumper either, but we do take the advice on board and will look to see what we can do to unlock the quality of the sound file.

 

Cheers!

 

Fran 

 

That's good to hear, thanks.

 

In tender locos you might consider making not just the coal load removable but some or all of the tank top as well. That would allow people not interested in sound to have a partly-filled coal space if they want and for those who are interested in sound to remove the tank top to give more room under the coal load for a big speaker.

 

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, TimberValleyRailway said:

Well my Erlestoke arrived today, and to be frank I'm horrified. The detail is lovely - far better than anything else I've ever seen, but the performance is dire. Slowing right down to a crawl on 3rd radius curves - at 40% speed, no crawling capapbility whatsoever - anyone else had this issue?


Edit - should probably add that i'm already in touch about Torquay, but will also mention Erlestoke!

Nope. Running mine on DC with 9 Coaches (Baccy Portholes and crappy Dapol MR Gangway Stock re-wheeled) and with  an old H & M Controller on almost all 30' curves off stage. Thoroughly smooth and with great speed control and zero wheel spin even on starting on curves.

Sorry.

Phil

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Harlequin said:

@Accurascale Fran

On future steam locos please make allowance for the biggest possible speaker(s) you can practically fit so that the sound is up to the standard of your diesel locos.

Thanks.

 

 

3 hours ago, Accurascale Fran said:

 

Hi Phil,

 

Noted of course. Believe me, we tried to get an Accurathrash speaker to fit in the manor tender,

 

Cheers!

 

Fran 

A Stanier tender should have enough room.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally ran mine up my 1.86% 30” radius helix and it pulled an Accurascale Siphon G plus 3 Hornby coaches without issues. Compare that to a Hornby King class pulling the siphon plus 5 coaches. The King manages 2 extra coaches because the engine is 19g heavier and its tender is 68g lighter. The keep alive does a great job but as expected only works with a DCC decoder installed. 

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
3 hours ago, Mallard60022 said:

Nope. R.... on almost all 30' curves off stage. Thoroughly smooth and with great speed control and zero wheel spin even on starting on curves.

 

30" radius is approximately of what would be 7th radius, Timbervalleyrailway was asking about 3rd radius which is 20" curves, I would be most interested whilst I await mine if anyone has issues on 3rd radius, as I have a 3.5 radius (21" 1/4 ) one end and a 4.5 radius (23.5") at the other.  Thanks' 

Edited by IOW O2
  • Like 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
4 hours ago, MikeParkin65 said:

Very happy with mine on DCC so no complaints from me but if the DCC ready ones have the capacitors fitted could it be they are sucking up current and therefore causing a voltage drop

That's not how capacitors work

An ideal capacitor will not suck up current when fully charged, if indeed they are even in circuit on DC with blanking plug. (which I doubt.)

Edited by melmerby
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
4 hours ago, Harlequin said:

 

That's good to hear, thanks.

 

In tender locos you might consider making not just the coal load removable but some or all of the tank top as well. That would allow people not interested in sound to have a partly-filled coal space if they want and for those who are interested in sound to remove the tank top to give more room under the coal load for a big speaker.

 

Phil one noticeable thing with 'Manors' in BR days was that they tended to have quite a large heap of coal in the tender.  often level with the top of the cab windows and sometimes higher at the peak of the heap.  Difficult to find GWR era photos which show this but there are one or two which do.  So that.  might offer a possible route to finding or creating a bit more pace?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, KeithAnthony said:

No issues on 2nd radius if that helps.Have left the cylinder cut away as delivered.

Thanks, reassuring.

2 hours ago, Cofga said:

The King manages 2 extra coaches because the engine is 19g heavier...

I thought Accu said the loco would be 400g on its own.  My 2017 Hby King weighs in at 320g (DCC ready) which makes the manor at 19g less at 301. Which makes it the same weight as the bigger W/C spamcan with a plastic body.  Will be interesting.🙂

Edited by IOW O2
added - Hby King-
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Accurascale staff
31 minutes ago, IOW O2 said:

Thanks, reassuring.

I thought Accu said the loco would be 400g on its own.  My 2017 weighs in at 320g (DCC ready) which makes the manor at 19g less at 301. Which makes it the same weight as the bigger W/C spamcan with a plastic body.  Will be interesting.🙂

 

The Manor is 420g including tender so the numbers sound a little out :) 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
12 minutes ago, McC said:

The Manor is 420g including tender so the numbers sound a little out :) 

Thanks', I added that it was a 2017 Hby king at 320g, I await with bated breath.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
8 hours ago, TimberValleyRailway said:

Glad it's not just me, i'll test it at my model club tonight to see if the issue persists.

 

Any other analogue users on here, what's your experience been like?

Swooped my manor today, my new still slows on the curves but no where near as much as the first one, you can hear the pitch of the motor change as well, wonder if it lacks torque. Anyway happy with my replacement 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Accurascale staff
10 minutes ago, jonnyuk said:

Swooped my manor today, my new still slows on the curves but no where near as much as the first one, you can hear the pitch of the motor change as well, wonder if it lacks torque. Anyway happy with my replacement 

 

The loco can pull over 40 coaches so it’s definitely not torque. Make sure the tender is in the ‘tight’ curve setting further away from the loco?  Assume running with the 2ns radius cutouts in place still too?

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, IOW O2 said:

Thanks, reassuring.

I thought Accu said the loco would be 400g on its own.  My 2017 Hby King weighs in at 320g (DCC ready) which makes the manor at 19g less at 301. Which makes it the same weight as the bigger W/C spamcan with a plastic body.  Will be interesting.🙂

I misspoke as the King tender was only 32g lighter not 68g. My King came in the Bristolian set about 2020 direct from Hong Kong via eBay so I figure it came out the back door of the factory or warehouse. I weighed them out individually and the Manor engine was 316g with a 100g tender=416g total. The King engine weighed 335g with a 68g tender=403g.  So The important thing is the heavier tender on the Manor along with it’s lighter engine reduced it’s pulling power compared to the King by a couple of coaches.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
21 hours ago, Cofga said:

I finally ran mine up my 1.86% 30” radius helix and it pulled an Accurascale Siphon G plus 3 Hornby coaches without issues. Compare that to a Hornby King class pulling the siphon plus 5 coaches. The King manages 2 extra coaches because the engine is 19g heavier and its tender is 68g lighter. The keep alive does a great job but as expected only works with a DCC decoder installed. 

Do bear in mind that all locos gradually gain haulage power as (a) the mechanism beds in, and (b) the shine gets knocked off the wheels so they become less prone to slipping.

 

Both these vary considerably according to how the model gets "run-in", especially the latter, which only happens on track; a rolling road does not provide the necessary friction. Also, what usually takes a few weeks or months on a continuous-run layout can be expected to take much longer on a terminus/FY set-up.

 

In order to optimise the process, the loco needs to encounter both right-hand and left-hand curves in approximately equal measure which, on most layouts, will mean regularly turning it. 

 

In my experience, my "highest mileage" Bachmann locos can handle about double the loads they could manage when new. However, reaching a performance plateau took a surprisingly long time, suggesting that "complete" running-in can be a very protracted process. I find that Hornby locos similarly improve as mileage accumulates, though the difference between "before" and "after" tends to be less pronounced.

 

How the Accurascale Manor will compare, remains to be seen, but I never expect any new loco to develop "maximum grunt" straight out of the box and overloading is likely to be counter-productive in the longer term.

 

My 7802 will therefore only be expected to deal with 5/6 coaches to begin with, which I shall gradually increase that as it reaches a similar speed on a lower controller setting than before.  

 

John

 

 

Edited by Dunsignalling
  • Like 2
  • Agree 7
  • Informative/Useful 4
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...