Jump to content
 

Planet Industrials - the story so far...


James Hilton
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, PenrithBeacon said:

Sorry don't know

Sorry David,

Poor attempt at a joke. The boiler on that loco reminded me of a moonshiner's illegal still, hence the names I've mentioned.

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/05/2024 at 22:24, HExpressD said:

This (the 4th this) I believe could be covered by the Accurascale (nee Hattons) AB tooling.

 

If this is "Colin McAndrew" the prototype loco is tiny, IMHO smaller than the Hattons Barclay. Might be wrong though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Covkid said:

 

If this is "Colin McAndrew" the prototype loco is tiny, IMHO smaller than the Hattons Barclay. Might be wrong though.

 

Colin McAndrew is cerainly small, as can be seen in relation to the size of the driver in one of these shots!

 

21-149.JPG.7b19f3ecd1fb6a4aa0782487717e0139.JPG

 

20-338.JPG.f94e75faa9519789fe88cb5e1d81b2bc.JPG

 

Would certainly be a nice loco to have a model of.............

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If we're going to ask PI for a diesel, it has to be the Ruston Hornsby 165

 

Half the hard work has already been done in the thread below :)

 

Had some BR use, some industrials, some flame-proof variants with RAF. Some entered preservation. Lots of lovely detail changes. Narrow planet did a kit but it seems always to be sold out.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

gl_221028_1_795.jpg

 

Powlesland and Mason, Brush-built 0-4-0 in her post-1926 Swindon pannier configuration.

 

One of pair, built 1903 (795) and 1906 (921) as saddletanks. Both taken on by the GWR in 1924, after which they both underwent significant work. Both sold to industry by 1930...

51895506713_531682f258_k.jpg

...and worked for another c.30 years (IIUC). 795 then went for scrap, but 921 has been preserved:

brush-921-snibson-discovery-park-oct-201

Now on static display at Mountsorrel and Rothley Heritage Centre, Leicestershire.

 

With a dash of modeller's licence, PI could perhaps reasonably reproduce these fascinating locos, part absolutely typical part absolutely unique. Would metal chassis, running plate, and boiler give enough weight for tanks and cabs to be serparate plastic parts? The former could then be universal, with only the latter changing to give an excellently useful industrial/dock locos accurate for anywhere in a 60-70 year working life.

 

Not a request, just a conversation starter :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 14/05/2024 at 05:49, PenrithBeacon said:

Turning to diesels:

image.png.fbdedf51aced4662b0871fd2b0ee6576.png

 

image.png.1af900e909b6a41ec062b293902c66a1.png

 

image.png.067f11549a1bb7fba71ffe9e73e12976.png

 

There are lots more!

 

All three are available as kits. The first two from HighLevel the last from Judith Edge.

 

HTH

 

David

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
5 hours ago, Schooner said:

gl_221028_1_795.jpg

 

Powlesland and Mason, Brush-built 0-4-0 in her post-1926 Swindon pannier configuration.

 

One of pair, built 1903 (795) and 1906 (921) as saddletanks. Both taken on by the GWR in 1924, after which they both underwent significant work. Both sold to industry by 1930...

51895506713_531682f258_k.jpg

...and worked for another c.30 years (IIUC). 795 then went for scrap, but 921 has been preserved:

 

An 0-4-0 pannier is just against the Laws of Nature, the Universe and Everything...

 

  • Like 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...