Jump to content
 

Please use M,M&M only for topics that do not fit within other forum areas. All topics posted here await admin team approval to ensure they don't belong elsewhere.

Imaginary Locomotives


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
21 minutes ago, AlfaZagato said:

surprisingly vast parts of the Pennsy, all wired.

 

A classic view:

 

The_Congressional_Pennsylvania_Railroad.

 

Class GG1 No. 4868 on 'The Congressional', October 1965. That really is the sort of locomotive one couldn't imagine, if it wasn't real.

 

[Embedded link to Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain.]

  • Like 1
  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

My pen friends father was an engineer on the Penn Central and I got to ride a GG1 a couple of times from Perth Amboy into Penn Sta NY. They were amazing machines only thing better would have been to go on a K4 Pacific, 10years to late for that!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
27 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

Class GG1 No. 4868 on 'The Congressional', October 1965. That really is the sort of locomotive one couldn't imagine, if it wasn't real.

 

 

Frankly, most pre-WW2 electric locos look pretty strange to anyone raised on they typical late 20th Century Bo-Bo.  I almost suggested electrification and a Midland Krokodil for the Lickey.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
On 02/08/2024 at 15:36, Flying Pig said:

 

Frankly, most pre-WW2 electric locos look pretty strange to anyone raised on they typical late 20th Century Bo-Bo.  I almost suggested electrification and a Midland Krokodil for the Lickey.

Why not, to avoid the cost of whole-route electrification, just electrify Bromsgrove-Barnt Green, purely for the "banker"?  After all the MS&L was electrified primarily to solve the problem of Worsborough incline.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
8 minutes ago, Northmoor said:

Why not, to avoid the cost of whole-route electrification, just electrify Bromsgrove-Barnt Green, purely for the "banker"?  After all the MS&L was electrified primarily to solve the problem of Worsborough incline.

 

That was pretty much my thinking, though the wires would probably only need to go as far as Blackwell where the bankers came off.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
9 hours ago, Northmoor said:

Why not, to avoid the cost of whole-route electrification, just electrify Bromsgrove-Barnt Green, purely for the "banker"?  After all the MS&L was electrified primarily to solve the problem of Worsborough incline.

The Worsborough branch was the first part switched on but the scheme was a lot more ambitious than that, the initial order was for 27 EM2s - the main line scheme was cut back a lot very quickly.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't there an earlier GC proposal to electrify just the bank, based on a visit by Robinson to the states, I'm sure SR Batty mentions it. Would love to see a GC electric loco on Michaels layout alongside EB1 :-)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 05/08/2024 at 07:56, Michael Edge said:

The Worsborough branch was the first part switched on but the scheme was a lot more ambitious than that, the initial order was for 27 EM2s - the main line scheme was cut back a lot very quickly.

Think I've mentioned this before, I've seen a diagram which showed electrification round the Fallowfield Loop and into Central and also the chord towards Trafford Park.

 

I can well imagine the GC directors considering electrification of the Woodhead line, given the atmosphere inside the tunnels themselves. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 62613 said:

I can well imagine the GC directors considering electrification of the Woodhead line, given the atmosphere inside the tunnels themselves. 

I can also imagine them either chickening out when they found out the scheme would have needed a new tunnel, or going third rail. BR put in the extra tunnel.

 

But I thought it was Worsborough that had legendarily bad air in its tunnels. Woodhead as well?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The old Woodhead tunnels were truly awful, the south tunnel was falling in (still is) and they weren't big enough to put wires in. At one time there was an intermediate block signal box in the middle, serving both tunnels but it was abandoned due to appalling conditions in there. The Silkstone tunnels on the Worsborough branch are considerably bigger (double track), the bad conditions were caused by trains traveling at about 4mph with up to five locos on each.

  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DenysW said:

I can also imagine them either chickening out when they found out the scheme would have needed a new tunnel, or going third rail. BR put in the extra tunnel.

 

But I thought it was Worsborough that had legendarily bad air in its tunnels. Woodhead as well?

The tunnels were on a gradient, weren't they; not sure which way, but locos would obviously have had to keep steam on in the uphill, which wouldn't have been fun.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody mentioned this on another thread recently.  Going from memory, a Premium Apprentice, (or Trainee Manager), recalled travelling east on the footplate of a Goods Train.  The Fireman banked the firebox right to the bottom of the fire hole, the three men covered their heads with wet towels and dropped to the floor on entering the tunnel.  A very unpleasant three miles in the dark!

 

Paul

  • Like 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Michael Edge said:

The old Woodhead tunnels were truly awful, the south tunnel was falling in (still is) and they weren't big enough to put wires in. At one time there was an intermediate block signal box in the middle, serving both tunnels but it was abandoned due to appalling conditions in there. The Silkstone tunnels on the Worsborough branch are considerably bigger (double track), the bad conditions were caused by trains traveling at about 4mph with up to five locos on each.

The tunnels which now form the Thames link at King X / St Pancras had a signal box under the road. It was reached by a flight of spiral stairs from street level. 

 

The signalman would then cross the (unlit) lines to the box....

 

Ventilation was by a single grating in the pavement. It must have been absolutely deaadful. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, 62613 said:

The tunnels were on a gradient, weren't they; not sure which way, but locos would obviously have had to keep steam on in the uphill, which wouldn't have been fun.

The summit is about two thirds of the way along from the western side, so at least the loads were mostly going downhill.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...