Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, Fishplate said:

Love the reflections* in that picture. So realistic. 

 

* you might get the 'love heart' reflection if you put the swans beak-to beak. 


Thank you, I’ll see what I can do

 

these I’ve started to paint are springside white metal items

 

but having a look on the net I’ve just downloaded some printable STL files so I should hopefully be able to print my own

 

IMG_8887.png.02cd7b66013a6006df4013431f398bd5.pngIMG_8886.png.b300fe4a5dc56a6149ea46b4a1c26d69.png
 

It cost me a fiver but I thought it would be worth a try

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I’ve printed some swans

 

IMG_8891.jpeg.585ee99b6eacb8511e9a877b685d4e0f.jpeg

 

IMG_8892.jpeg.2f8e139b6bf044e2f14bf481d4a91e53.jpeg

 

’C’ left ‘B’ right compared to the Springside models

 

IMG_8894.jpeg.836820ef825c120f83ee5ef32a7a7063.jpeg

 

Both ‘C’ but with one smaller than the other

 

Edited by chuffinghell
  • Like 9
  • Craftsmanship/clever 4
  • Round of applause 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Probably just me but I thought that the first one (A) looked a bit too ornamental, for some reason looking at it made me want to buy matches?

 

I think (C) is the best one because the ‘feathers’ are more subtle

 

Interested in other people’s options though

 

 

  • Agree 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
26 minutes ago, chuffinghell said:

Probably just me but I thought that the first one (A) looked a bit too ornamental, for some reason looking at it made me want to buy matches?

 

I think (C) is the best one because the ‘feathers’ are more subtle

 

Interested in other people’s options though

 

 

 

I agree, Chris. A is very stylised. I think the Springside ones are the best though.

  • Agree 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
44 minutes ago, Rowsley17D said:

I think the Springside ones are the best though.


That surprised me!

 

I’m not keen on the springside ones if I’m honest, mainly because there is very little detail on them….


IMG_8894.jpeg.999f9e4a31bee99539648bbee85dac59.jpeg

 

….especially the one on the right

 

It could just be because I don’t like white metal figures in general maybe?

 

Edited by chuffinghell
  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, chuffinghell said:


That surprised me!

 

I’m not keen on the springside ones if I’m honest, mainly because there is very little detail on them….


IMG_8894.jpeg.999f9e4a31bee99539648bbee85dac59.jpeg

 

….especially the one on the right

 

It could just be because I don’t like white metal figures in general maybe?

 

 

Nothing wrong with any of yours at all Chris. They are all excellent.👍

Edited by Winslow Boy
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, chuffinghell said:

That surprised me!

 

I’m not keen on the springside ones if I’m honest, mainly because there is very little detail on them….

 

I quite agree, they look like blobs compared to yours.

  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

To me, 'C' has the better head shape than the metal versions. To make the feathers less pronounced give it a coat of white primer and then a couple of coats of white, that should loose some of the definition then place it on the canal along side the metal swan and see which looks best.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
15 hours ago, chuffinghell said:


That surprised me!

 

I’m not keen on the springside ones if I’m honest, mainly because there is very little detail on them….


IMG_8894.jpeg.999f9e4a31bee99539648bbee85dac59.jpeg

 

….especially the one on the right

 

It could just be because I don’t like white metal figures in general maybe?

 

 

They look more like duck billed platypussies .The beak is much more refined on the printed ones and the overall shape more defined IMHO.

  • Agree 3
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Dont forget the Springside ones have been around for years .... I used to paint batches of them for Springside for their trade stands back in the early 80's

 

Jess Janes was their pattern maker for a long time, very skilled engineer ex Reading Post Office after he came out of the Navy, he moved to Newton Abbot in the 70's and worked on the DVR as a fitter initially as a volunteer than full time staff till early 80's - great character.

 

When he retired from Springside he specialised on rebuilding LGB locos as custom build engines mainly selling them through GRS - Garden Rail Specialist 

 

Sadly been gone maybe 20 years ago

 

 

Edited by John Besley
Schpelling
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
38 minutes ago, hmrspaul said:

That's very nice, the rivetting is very fine. I think your door framing is rather heavy though, makes the panel of the door appear too narrow. https://PaulBartlett.zenfolio.com/gwrdeptcoach/ec38497c

 

Paul


Thanks Paul

 

I’ll look at thinning the frame where I can, not too difficult

 

Out of interest I thought that the V hanger on the CC2 was off centre but the photo in the link shows it in the centre, have I messed up?


IMG_8676.jpeg.8bbb5539d97d9d968ea261270b262493.jpeg

 

IMG_8675.jpeg.1bf6b9b8cc4187bfbd961f611a6a901e.jpeg

 

Thanks

 

Chris

 

 

 

Edited by chuffinghell
  • Like 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
20 minutes ago, Silas said:

That brake gear is stunning!


Thank you

 

best I could do from various photos found on the interweb plus some compromising has to be made to suit the capabilities of my printer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...