Jump to content
 

West Highland Line V4, a 1980's West Highland Line layout


young37215
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Alcanman said:

Great photos, which remind me of this photo of 37027 arriving at Crianlarich.

37027 Loch Eil at Crianlarich, August 1984 - 2.jpg

Hi,

cracking photo!

 

I wonder how many modellers would spend time making sure there was no kink in the track and that the signal post was truly vertical!

 

Roja

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I like the picture of 37027 arriving at Crianlarich, it's not an angle that I have used for photographing arrivals and I am always looking for inspiration with new angles. 

 

In between chopping and glueing polystyrene for the ongoing landscape work, I finally sorted out the headcode lights on 37111. The problem was the wiring that powers the headcode lighting was fouling the bodyshell which appeared to be in the correct place but moved when the bodyshell was placed on the chassis. The solution was rather than dropping the bodyshell onto the chassis as I would normally do, I dropped the chassis onto the bodyshell which reduced the potential for the wiring to move. Net result is 37111 is now fully functional although it still needs weathering. At least I got to tick one item off of the long list of 'to do's'. Having cleaned some of the weathering off of 37011 and fitted new nose ends with cut down cowling, I used the chassis from 37114 to create 37011 as it was in the mid 1980's prior to its 1987 accident and subsequent withdrawl. I am missing the headlight which the SDEG advise 37011 acquired in 1982 whilst on loan to Inverness; my current thinking is to add another jewel in the same way as I did on 37017. 

 

At last, working headcode lights at both ends

 

131223(21).JPG.d8d72ddf3ce8bc89caa05a96d7182197.JPG

 

131223(22).JPG.eb076af98ffc49d1de991fa7439116be.JPG

 

Revised 37011 bodyshell awaits a new chassis

 

131223(10).JPG.1358b2eca9f6089b1032b93665f703e9.JPG

 

I added a second driver to the chassis from 37114, I like to see a driver in the cab of a loco.

 

131223(19).JPG.98554103f58613d22780d38c76c5ab4f.JPG

 

37011 on new chassis with working headcode lights 

 

131223(20).JPG.c217bdb3d0aef0c2e032668e41a7bd23.JPG

Edited by young37215
  • Like 11
  • Agree 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great work with 37011, a loco that I managed to photograph in both BR Blue and LL Blue.

 

I hope you don't mind me hi-jacking your excellent thread with my prototype photos but it's great seeing the locos that I have fond memories of,  in model form.

 

Here is 37011 arriving at Glasgow QS.

 

Mal

37011 at GQS.jpg

  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I was a little concerned that the black headcode panels were incorrect for 37011 but managed to find a 1985 picture that reassures me they are fine. I might change them to yellow ones at some stage because 37011 ran for most of the early 1980's as per @Alcanman's picture. Snow ploughs are another longstanding issue, I will find a way to add them along with other bufferbeam detailing at some stage but for now I am content that the revised 37011 is good to go as is. 

 

37011

 

Yesterday was all glueing and cuttting again with some rock mold casting thrown in for good measure. Baseboard starting point, the track on the right is the Alcan Aluminium works siding which will be hidden. 

 

131223(6).JPG.d021c5a5eef95080efc2ed61d37419c4.JPG

 

Gradient of about 1:100 created using 3mm cork. Track weathered, ballasted and glued.

 

131223(17).JPG.67cd67249318734c02375d4817eed9bd.JPG

 

The Alcan siding will be hidden but for access purposes I have created a 'removable scenic lid'

 

131223(16).JPG.95712bb3169a8bd3d93c8bdbb9dc81d6.JPG

 

 

  • Like 17
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

A question that I meant to raise in my earlier post. The 50 degree gradient on the mountainside means that it is challenging to get the scenic material to stay in place even though it is laid on a layer of PVA. Woodland Scenics recommend their scenic cement but I find this disturbs the material when being sprayed on because it is not fine enough, I need something that produces a fine mist that setlles on top of the materials and holds them in place. I am thinking about trying a cheap matt varnish to mist over, before I do has anyone found an effective way of securing scenic material on similar gradients?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I bought my own cheap mister bottles example here although there are many other suppliers.

 

Experiment with a pva/water mix until it does job.   I found 50/50 works for me on slopes.  Adding usual drop of washing up liquid helps too.  Don’t forget to clean them and flush through several times after use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
30 minutes ago, young37215 said:

A question that I meant to raise in my earlier post. The 50 degree gradient on the mountainside means that it is challenging to get the scenic material to stay in place even though it is laid on a layer of PVA. Woodland Scenics recommend their scenic cement but I find this disturbs the material when being sprayed on because it is not fine enough, I need something that produces a fine mist that setlles on top of the materials and holds them in place. I am thinking about trying a cheap matt varnish to mist over, before I do has anyone found an effective way of securing scenic material on similar gradients?

 

Is there a way you could turn the board to make the gradient flat(er)?

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I've used cheap non-perfumed hairspray, sprayed as a mist from a reasonable distance on my 3mm S&DJR layout of Masbury which has some reasonably high embankments on it. This has held the flock in place through many movements up and down out of my loft over the last 20 odd years since we made it down at Leeds MRC. Worth a try, my can only cost a couple of pounds.

 

Regards and seasons greetings to all involved on this thread.

Ian.

  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not used flock for a while, but with static grass, I found that simply painting cheap Poundland PVA glue onto a 45 degree surface with a brush I was able to get reasonable coverage using my flykiller / sieve applicator. Any surplus which ended up at the foot of the bank after the glue had dried was hoovered up with a keyboard vacuum cleaner for re-use.

 

An example :

 

 

WhittTrees

 

That said, looking back through more recent diorama photos, I seem to have gone more over to hanging basket liner, at least for 1:76 and larger scales.

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Progress after several stressful days spent flapping over how to fit the mountain scenery together in addition to allowing large quantities of glue to set. 4 of 6 of the sections are complete from a landscaping perspective with the remaining two in the middle still under construction. I have returned the upper level sections to the layout and managed to join the track together once more. The track on the middle section has been weathered but is not yet ballasted meaning that apart from a short section of track on the approach to Fort WIlliam, I have now completed all of the planned track weathering on WHL4. In theory I have now broken the back of the current landscape work and should be able to complete this in the coming days. 

 

Looking south from Mallaig Junction fiddle yard, the lower level on the left will be joined to the upper level using plaster cloth once I have cut the insulation to the profile I require.

 

221223(6).JPG.f6b2e756113cc35bbfc4cee3e7ba492d.JPG

 

Middle upper section removed for track weathering

 

221223(13).JPG.89aef59f511d9a288e5baee907cb5d85.JPG

 

Middle section restored and insulation cut roughly to form the base of the landscape

 

221223(16).JPG.59483beecbde11a2b638f45c85f8629b.JPG

 

221223(17).JPG.6ca83423097528006890b1984196ecf0.JPG

 

 

 

Edited by young37215
  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

The PRA wagons have not been doing much of late because they did not respond well to my back to back testing. All of the wheels were tight to gauge and got eased out which resulted in much squealing and grating when subsequently running the wagons. I reamed out the axle boxes with my tyre tuner in an effort to reduce the friction caused by the slight widening of the axle which is a right faff because the PRA is such a delicate model. Any handling invariably results in part coming off and having to be reattached which meant I spent a couple of hours on just the 4 PRA's. Despite my best efforts there was still noticeable resistance on the axles when the wagons were tested after reassembly.

 

Being delicate is not meant as a criticisim, it is a function of the model which as far as I am concerned is an excellent representation although I suppose it is fair to say that the wheels could have been better and built to gauge. I will try the wagons in service and see how they run before deciding if any further work is necessary. In between the PRA remedial work recently updated 37011 got an outing to Oban with 8B05, the daily freight from Mossend seen departing Arrochar and passing through the countryside before crossing the viaduct on the approach to Ardlui.  

 

261223(1).JPG.72fe065e434e6eb9f221f29ab235da0d.JPG

 

261223(3).JPG.6df6d0c6e9692ea589c6f7316b17d897.JPG

 

261223(5).JPG.b9a90519bf56fcb9dbad584ae7c62645.JPG

 

261223(7).JPG.0b7499bcd163ff9812152f6b5ce9f79e.JPG

 

  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...