Dr Al Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 I'm not so well versed in GWR locos, but looking straight at prototype pics, like that below, it does look like there is something amiss with the taper on the boiler: Cheers,Alan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted March 23, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted March 23, 2016 (edited) Likewise I'm no expert on GWR locos, and i'm not particularly a fan of comparing model & real thing without photos taken from almost identical angles, otherwise you can be led to all kinds of false impressions. The closest I could get is this: It is still a slightly unfair comparison as 5051 has a lowered cab roof and the angle the photo is taken from is not exactly the same as the model which gives the impression on the model that the angle of the top of the firebox is off. My initial impression from this comparison was that the boiler was perhaps a little 'undernourished', however having looked at it again I think that may be due to the unpainted section which forms part of the chassis between the first & second splashers. All of that light between the front bogie and frames doesn't do the model any favours from this angle either! Think i'll reserve finial judgement until I see a factory finished version in the flesh. Tom. Edited March 23, 2016 by TomE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zunnan Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 That comparison shows precisely where I feel the model is wrong having stared at it for considerable time. Look at the rake of the firebox front, as well as the radius of the cladding in the same area. The model is very squared off with a forward lean where as the prototype image below shows a slight backward lean and a very rounded off front edge to the cladding. The radius of the firebox front looks like it extends back almost to the first line, but the model with its forward lean and tight radius is much straighter for a greater distance. The boiler does look a little undernourished, it is missing the extra taper of the front boiler cladding that clearly shows in the prototype image, but I think the main issue is the firebox front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Kris Posted March 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 23, 2016 The light above the bogie certainly does not help. Some blocking inserts would help a lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy L S Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 To me, from those pics it seems like the top of the firebox is not rounded enough on the corners, it reminds me of my old Triang TT Castle in that respect. Of course I should add that it could be the camera angle, light and who knows what else creating an illusion when it is in fact spot on, so probably best not to draw too many conclusions just yet. Roy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Higgs Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 To me, from those pics it seems like the top of the firebox is not rounded enough on the corners, it reminds me of my old Triang TT Castle in that respect. Of course I should add that it could be the camera angle, light and who knows what else creating an illusion when it is in fact spot on, so probably best not to draw too many conclusions just yet. Roy To me, the firebox also looks not large enough in comparison to the cab. That could be the firebox, or the cab. Drawing conclusions now rather depends on whether anything can be done about it at this stage. I have to say as a 4mm modeller, I do wish someone had spotted the howler Bachmann had made with the front frames on their Modified Hall and shouted out about it, rather than us now having to live with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted March 26, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted March 26, 2016 I was hoping Bachmann would have the EP samples for the Castle on display at York today so I could have a closer look at it in the flesh, but it was conspicuous by its absence. Tom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zunnan Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 Here is hoping that it is not too late for them to make a few tweaks here and there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahame Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 I was hoping Bachmann would have the EP samples for the Castle on display at York today so I could have a closer look at it in the flesh, but it was conspicuous by its absence. Tom. Odd, as photos of grey EP samples of the three versions they are producing have been published in a number of mags and featured on their website. G. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Kris Posted March 28, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 28, 2016 Odd, as photos of grey EP samples of the three versions they are producing have been published in a number of mags and featured on their website. G. Maybe the fear that too many would take it as a finished model and criticise as such rather than criticising it as an EP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zunnan Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Isn't the whole point of an EP to identify whether the design is ready for production or whether some alterations may be necessary? In that respect, identifying that some alteration may be necessary with the current design in order to produce a better model, this EP has served its purpose perfectly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Kris Posted March 28, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted March 28, 2016 Isn't the whole point of an EP to identify whether the design is ready for production or whether some alterations may be necessary? In that respect, identifying that some alteration may be necessary with the current design in order to produce a better model, this EP has served its purpose perfectly. It is, but from observations of comments on here and in other locations, far too many people see them as a finish produce and instantly say it's all wrong I'm not buying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodenhead Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 It is, but from observations of comments on here and in other locations, far too many people see them as a finish produce and instantly say it's all wrong I'm not buying. That's correct, after seeing this EP I'm not buying one, I'll hang on and buy a production one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy L S Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 I would have thought that if we are seeing deco samples the tooling had been signed off, so that what we have been shown is (was intended to be?) the production model. Maybe Bachmann have now decided to withdraw the models from display at York to double check everything given people's comments on here (including mine). That would seem quite sensible and if so to their credit. We know the quality of the N models Bachmann are capable of so maybe on reflection we should wait and see. Roy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted March 28, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted March 28, 2016 I'm pretty certain that we've only seen hand painted samples so far Roy. I'm certain the images on the Bachmann website are hand painted, or photoshopped, or maybe a combination of both. Those in Andy's photos are definitely hand painted. Looking again at the comparison photos above, I would agree with Zunnan's comments on the front edge of the firebox. However, having looked again at other photos of Castles they appear to show less of a radius than present on 5051: The grey EP looks a closer match to this than the painted samples, so it's difficult to work out whats going on with the painted samples which appear to show issues with the firebox & possibly boiler. Different EPs perhaps? Tom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leachsprite4 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 To me it looks like the boiler sits fractionally too low where it meets the firebox. Also the firebox top corners are too square. So had to look up images of 4073 for comparison and to me these confirm this. Looking back it's fair to say we all missed this earlier on its simplly emphasised by paint. Graham Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Y Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 I would have thought that if we are seeing deco samples the tooling had been signed off, so that what we have been shown is (was intended to be?) the production model. Maybe Bachmann have now decided to withdraw the models from display at York to double check everything given people's comments on here (including mine). That would seem quite sensible and if so to their credit. We know the quality of the N models Bachmann are capable of so maybe on reflection we should wait and see. Roy Bachmann don't always take all EP samples and all new products to every show. The Castles only didn't go because it's North Eastern territory. I know some well known custodians of the real thing have looked over the Farish Castle favourably too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium rprodgers Posted April 28, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 28, 2016 (edited) Are we assuming that the tooling for this has been signed off? It is a vast improvement on the GF but still doesn't quite seem there. Looking at the image of the model it is not helped by the over heavy lining that may create a false impression. However the amount of day light at the front and the undernourished single chimney also concern me. GWR boiler fittings often seem to be a weak point on models and are either to slender or require some work with a file. I agree with other comments about the firebox and boiler shape. The cab side/ cab window relationship looks awry but that could be due to a visual distortion created by the lining. Will wait and see how the production version turns out I have two on order. Edited April 28, 2016 by rprodgers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold TomE Posted April 28, 2016 Author RMweb Gold Share Posted April 28, 2016 There is a much higher res photo of Nunney Castle now on the Bachmann site: http://www.Bachmann.co.uk/image_box.php?image=images1/farish/372-033DS.jpg&cat_no=372-033DS&info=0&width=1500&height=430 Still hand painted sample though. Tom. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahame Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 Still hand painted sample though. Tom. I wouldn't mind being able to 'hand paint' and add decals to models that well. G. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDJR7F88 Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 (edited) Hopefully this might be of interest... Don't model N myself currently, but on a recent visit to the Bristol Model Railway Exhibition, as well as filming the show I created a video of the Bachmann and Farish stand. On display was an EP of the Castle, which I got a good clip of if your interest... Edited May 10, 2016 by SDJR7F88 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDJR7F88 Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 (edited) The Footage of the Bachmann and Farish Roadshow at the 48th Annual Bristol Model Railway Exhibition... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Owv8mKsPZo4 Edited May 10, 2016 by SDJR7F88 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les1952 Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 Looking at that I could be tempted- even as a North Eastern Region modeller. Not just yet, however. I'll wait for the supply of good but cheap next18 chips to get sorted out. Maybe Croft Spa (the model) might yet have Clun Castle passing through it (as did Croft Spa the prototype....) Les Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karhedron Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Overall I am looking forward to the new Castle. The amount of daylight under the front bogie is disappointing but I suspect it is necessary to cope with 9" radius curves. The firebox cladding does look a little square in the photos but I would be surprised if Farish slipped up on basic dimensional details in this day and age. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pauliebanger Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Looking at that I could be tempted- even as a North Eastern Region modeller. Not just yet, however. I'll wait for the supply of good but cheap next18 chips to get sorted out. Maybe Croft Spa (the model) might yet have Clun Castle passing through it (as did Croft Spa the prototype....) Les Les, Very good quality indeed, but I don't know what you regard as cheap, are the ZIMO MX618N18 (non-sound) and MX658N18 (sound) decoders. ESU have a Next 18 LokPilot and I think a LokSound micro Kind regards, Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now