Jump to content
 

Photo's Of East Yorkshire Railways


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, micknich2003 said:

At one time, there were several signalboxe working the Goods Lines north of the passenger lines.

PRIORY EAST .jpg

PRIORY EAST from 5A Bridge.jpg

Copy of BILD0024.JPG

Very interesting pictures, i've not seen these before and i didn't know there was a signal box their either.  The admin block can just be discerned in the distance.  Mick was New Inward Yard a completely new build or were the sidings originally flat shunted and pre-date 1935?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Market65 said:

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you, Mick, for posting those photo’s of the Priory East diagram. Now, this afternoon, thanks to John Turner and Peter Brumby, on Flickr, we go once more to Brough. There are two photo’s of a train, and it is hauled by a B16/3, 4-6-0, 61444, of Hull Dairycoates, as it runs non-stop through Brough with an up parcels train, in about December, 1963. Just visible in the second photo’, on the right, is a class 124 TransPennine unit.

 

c.12/1963 - Brough, East Yorkshire.

 

c.12/1963 - Brough, East Yorkshire.


Best regards,

 

 Rob.

Such a shame one of these fine looking NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY locomotives never made it into to preservation.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/03/2023 at 18:11, Market65 said:

Good evening, everyone. Well, what a completely fascinating story that has been revealed about the proposals for the rerouting of the Main Passenger lines out of Hull. The only other thing I can think of is the Abercrombie Plan, which I understand did not get implemented. If there is any other information please feel free to post it in this thread. I have learnt a great deal over the last couple of days.

 

Now, this evening, with thanks to John Turner and Peter Brumby, on Flickr, we have a photo’ of LNER, B1, 4-6-0, 61032, Stembok, of 50B, at Brough with a Hull bound Class A passenger train, in January, 1965.

 

c.01/1965 - Brough, East Yorkshire.


Best regards,

 

Rob.

Railwaymen are like old soldiers Rob, we need to get them to share as much information about the past and documented before it's too late.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/03/2023 at 21:28, micknich2003 said:

Here are the remainder, should be possible to print them, and then glue them together.

BILD0044.JPG

BILD0045.JPG

BILD0046.JPG

BILD0047.JPG

 

On 15/03/2023 at 21:28, micknich2003 said:

Here are the remainder, should be possible to print them, and then glue them together.

BILD0044.JPG

BILD0045.JPG

BILD0046.JPG

BILD0047.JPG

I read somewhere  that after London & Liverpool, Hull was the third largest recorder of derailments.  It's easy to understand from these scale drawings.  The place would have been deadly for railwaymen, especially during thick fog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, everyone. This evening, thanks to John Turner and Peter Brumby, on Flickr, we have a side on portrait shof Gresley (ex-LNER) K3, 2-6-0, 61904, as it runs light towards Dairycoates, near Hessle Road, on the 20th February, 1960.

 

20/02/1960 - Hessle Road, Hull.


Best regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 19
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, everyone. This evening, thanks again to John Turner and Peter Brumby, on Flickr, we see a three quarter rear view of B1, 4-6-0, 61256, as it departs Paragon station with the Hull portion of the Yorkshire Pullman, on the 20th February, 1960.

 

20/02/1960 - Hull Paragon.


Best regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 minute ago, Market65 said:

Good evening, everyone. This evening, thanks again to John Turner and Peter Brumby, on Flickr, we see a three quarter rear view of B1, 4-6-0, 61256, as it departs Paragon station with the Hull portion of the Yorkshire Pullman, on the 20th February, 1960.

 

20/02/1960 - Hull Paragon.


Best regards,

 

 Rob.

A classic example of why Dr Beeching was commissioned to review the railways, even for what must have been one of the, if not THE, prestige service to/from Hull an absolutely filthy locomotive. People blame Beeching but it was Marples and Macmillan that commissioned the report. Reality it was necessary and, arguably, actually saved the railways for the long-term.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Good evening, everyone. This evening, with thanks again to John Turner and Peter Brumby, we have a photo’ of an unidentified Gresley, K3, 2-6-0, as it approaches Brough station with a 'class F' express freight for Hull, again on the 22nd February, 1960.

 

22/02/1960 - Brough, East Yorkshire.


Best regards,

 

 Rob.

  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 21/03/2023 at 18:55, john new said:

A classic example of why Dr Beeching was commissioned to review the railways, even for what must have been one of the, if not THE, prestige service to/from Hull an absolutely filthy locomotive. People blame Beeching but it was Marples and Macmillan that commissioned the report. Reality it was necessary and, arguably, actually saved the railways for the long-term.

 

But it could be argued that the report caused the downturn in caring for steam locos, since it predated the photo by around five years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
17 minutes ago, JeffP said:

But it could be argued that the report caused the downturn in caring for steam locos, since it predated the photo by around five years?

Wrong report but a valid point - modernisation plan IIRC 1955, the photo 1960, Beeching report 1963. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
On 23/03/2023 at 09:02, john new said:

Wrong report but a valid point - modernisation plan IIRC 1955, the photo 1960, Beeching report 1963. 

The biggest problem was staff recruitment.  Who wanted a job cleaning railway engines with relatively slow promotion (and potential early redundancy post Modernisation Plan) when plenty of far cleaner jobs paid better and had far more attractive working hours.   How would you fancy beingat getting to work by 06.00 to spend your day cleaning muck off rather grubby engines with much of the work being done outdoors in all kinds of weather and looking forward to promotion to a job which would require you to start work at any time of the day or night?

 

In Hull it was probably better than being a junior hand on a deep sea fishing boat but that was about all.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, The Stationmaster said:

The biggest problem was staff recruitment.  Who wanted a job cleaning railway engines with relatively slow promotion (and potential early redundancy post Modernisation Plan) when plenty of far cleaner jobs paid better and had far more attractive working hours.   How would you fancy beingat getting to work by 06.00 to spend your day cleaning muck off rather grubby engines with much of the work being done outdoors in all kinds of weather and looking forward to promotion to a job which would require you to start work at any time of the day or night?

 

In Hull it was probably better than being a junior hand on a deep sea fishing boat but that was about all.

Fully concur.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...